Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  235 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 235 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

Quantitation of EtG and EtS in Urine by

Ion-Pairing LC-MS/MS

Kristine Van Natta, Marta Kozak, Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA

Application Note 589

Key Words

EtG, EtS, ethyl glucuronide, ethyl sulfate, ion pairing, SPE, DHAA,

dihexylammonium acetate, TSQ Ultra, HyperSep, Hypercarb,

forensic toxicology

Goal

To develop an HPLC-MS/MS method for forensic toxicological analysis of

EtG and EtS in urine with limits of quantitation (LOQs) of 100 and 50 ng/mL,

respectively.

Introduction

Ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS) are

long-term biomarkers for ethanol consumption. Although

they are minor metabolites of ethanol, their longer

half-lives make them useful for forensic detection of past

alcohol use. These compounds are highly polar; they

retain poorly on most reversed-phase HPLC columns and

elute on or near the chromatographic solvent front. The

result is poor peak shape and large matrix effects. This

application note demonstrates the use of solid-phase

extraction (SPE) sample preconcentration to remove

interferences and an ion-pairing reagent to retain these

compounds on the HPLC column long enough to move

them off the solvent front. This enables better peak shape,

less matrix interference, and baseline resolution of both

analytes for less risk of ion suppression.

Experimental

Sample Preparation

A 1 mL volume of urine, 25 µL of internal standard

solution (50 and 5 ng/mL of EtG–

d

5

and EtS–

d

5

,

respectively), and 50 µL of formic acid were mixed.

The 200 mg Thermo Scientific

HyperSep

Hypercarb

SPE column (P/N 60106-301) was conditioned with 2 mL

of 1% formic acid in water. The sample was loaded at a

rate of 1–2 mL/min. Next, the column was washed with

2 mL of water and dried under nitrogen at 10–15 mm Hg

for 10 min. The sample was eluted with 2 mL of 1%

formic acid in methanol. The eluent was evaporated to

dryness under nitrogen at 37 °C and reconstituted in

0.2 mL of water.

1

Finally, 20 µL was injected onto the

HPLC-MS/MS.

Liquid Chromatography

Chromatographic separations were performed under

gradient conditions using a Thermo Scientific

Accela

1250 pump and Accela Open autosampler. The analytical

column was a Thermo Scientific Hypersil GOLD

column

(50 x 3 mm, 5 μm particle size). The column was

maintained at room temperature. The injection volume

was 20 μL. The flow rate was 1 mL/min, and the total run

time was 5 min. Other size columns can be used for this

application with the appropriate adjustment in injection

volumes and flow rates (as in AN488b

2

). Mobile phases

A and B consisted of 5 mM dihexylammoniumacetate

(TCI America) ion pairing reagent in water and

acetonitrile (Fisher Chemical), respectively. Mobile

phase C was acetonitrile/1-propanol/acetone (45:45:10).

Mass Spectrometry

MS analysis was carried out on a Thermo Scientific

TSQ Quantum Ultra

triple-stage quadrupole mass

spectrometer equipped with a heated electrospray

ionization (HESI-II) probe. Two selected-reaction

monitoring (SRM) transitions each were monitored for

EtG, EtS, and their deuterated internal standards to

provide ion ratio confirmations (IRC). Two scan

segments, one for EtG and its internal standard and one

for EtS and its internal standard, were used to maximize

the time the mass spectrometer spent scanning each

compound.

Results and Discussion

EtG demonstrated linear response from 100 to

100,000 ng/mL with an LOQ of 100 ng/mL. EtS

demonstrated linear response from 25 to 50,000 ng/mL

with an LOQ of 25 ng/mL. Figure 1 shows representative

calibration curves for both compounds. Figure 2 shows

representative chromatograms for EtG and EtS and their

respective LOQs.