Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  145 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 145 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

Simultaneous Quantitative Analysis

of Four Immunosuppressive Drugs Using

High Resolution Accurate Mass LC-MS

Neil Leaver

1

, Bevean Chihoho

1

, Helen Welchman

2

, Sarah Robinson

2

1

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, UK;

2

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, UK

Introduction

Immunosuppressive drugs have been quantitatively

analyzed by selected reaction monitoring (SRM) analysis

using tandem mass spectrometry for over 10 years in the

clinical research setting. High resolution accurate mass

(HRAM) mass spectrometry offers the same quantitative

performance characteristics with the added benefit of

significantly faster method development. The HRAM

method development time depends only on the sample

preparation and chromatography conditions. In addition,

mass analysis methods can be established rapidly because

there is no requirement to tune SRM transitions, collision

energies, or transfer lens voltages.

Goal

In this preliminary evaluation a set of calibrators, clinical

samples, and QCs are investigated with the analysis of

multiple replicates over the course of 7 days. The current

in-house validated liquid chromatography – tandem mass

spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method data is directly

compared against the use of HRAM LC-MS data.

Experimental Conditions

Sample Preparation

Commercial calibration

standards in frozen

stabilized whole blood

were sourced from

Chromsystems (München,

Germany). Commercial

quality control material

in stabilized whole blood

was sourced from More

Diagnostics (Los Osos,

CA, USA). All calibrators,

QCs, and whole blood

samples were extracted

using a plate-based solid

phase extraction (SPE)

procedure.

HPLC

Chromatographic separation was accomplished using

a Thermo Scientific Accela U-HPLC system. A Thermo

Scientific AQUASIL C18 column (150 x 2.1 mm, 5 µm)

heated to 50 ºC, was used with an isocratic gradient of

90% MeCN + ammonium acetate (2 mM). For each

sample, 20 µL was injected.

Mass Spectrometry

MS analysis was carried out on a Thermo Scientific

Exactive high performance benchtop mass spectrometer

powered by Orbitrap

TM

technology. Atmospheric pressure

chemical ionization (APCI) was used to generate the

[M+NH

3

]

+

ions for tacrolimus, sirolimus, and everolimus,

and the [M+H]

+

ions for cyclosporin, as well as two internal

standards: ascomycin (for cyclosporin and tacrolimus) and

desmethoxyrapamycin (for sirolimus and everolimus).

The Exactive

TM

mass spectrometer was set to scan at

50 K resolution over the range

m/z

700 – 1300 and was

calibrated once at the start of the 7-day analysis. Data

acquisition and analysis were carried out with Thermo

Scientific LC

quan

software.

Application

Note: 518

Key Words

• Exactive

• Accela U-HPLC

• Therapeutic Drug

Monitoring

• Clinical Research

Figure 1. XIC of lowest calibration standard.

C:\ThermoFisherScientific\...\Batch1_01

16/02/2010 17:27:48

Cal1

1.7

1.8

1.9

2.0

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

3.0

Time (min)

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

Relative Abundance

0

50

100

0

50

100

RT: 2.16

RT: 2.48

RT: 2.21

RT: 2.20

RT: 2.24

RT: 2.29

Tacrolimus

m/z

821.5160

Cyclosporin

m/z

1202.8509

Ascomycin

m/z

809.5171

(internal standard)

Sirolimus

m/z

931.5907

Everolimus

m/z

975.6172

Desmethoxyrapamycin

m/z

901.5797

(internal standard)

RT:

1.70 - 3.10

SM:

11G

Figure 1. XIC of lowest calibration standard

DOWNLOAD