Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  528 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 528 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

4

LC-MS methods, particularly those employing HRAM

detection, provide significant advantages over enzyme-

linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), capillary

electrophoresis (CE), and ultraviolet (UV) methods

because the selectivity of MS allows detection of

co-eluting analogs. Three co-eluting insulin analogs shown

in Figure 1 were easily separated based on the accurate

m/z

values of each precursor charge state and

corresponding isotopes. Comparative analyses for the

three insulin variants (porcine, human, and Apidra),

including XICs and the total isotopic distribution, are

shown in Figure 3. Pinpoint software automatically

calculated the dot product correlation coefficient for the

charge states that was used to evaluate isotopic

distribution overlap and filter results. Here the dot

product scores for each charge state and analog were

greater than 0.9, an excellent match.

1161.5

1162.0

1162.5

1163.0

1163.5

1164.0

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

1162.3384

1162.1372

1162.5384

1162.7383

1161.9371

1162.9387

1163.1391

1161.7375

1163.3386

1161.5357

1163.5349

1163.9267

1162.3362

1162.5366

1162.1358

1162.7369

1162.9372

1161.9354

1163.1375

1163.3378

1161.7348

1163.5381

1163.7383

1163.9386

NL:

5.86E4

Glu_Lan_Plasma_960pM_03#

642-660 RT: 4.66-4.78 AV:

19 T: FTMS + p ESI Full ms

[700.00-2000.00]

NL:

4.36E3

C

257

H

383

N

65

O

77

S

6

+H

:

C

257

H

388

N

65

O

77

S

6

p

(gss

,s

/p:40)Chrg5

R:32000 Res

.Pwr. @FWHM

Experimental

Theoretical

A+1

A+2 A+3 A+4

A+6

A+5

A+7

Figure 2. Data processing using Pinpoint software. Figure 2a shows the targeted data extraction based on isotopic

m/z

values for the

seven most abundant isotopes, and a ±7 ppm extraction tolerance based on the theoretical isotopic distribution. Figure 2b shows the

overlaid XICs for each of the targeted isotopes. The AUC values for each isotope were used to evaluate the scoring shown in Figure 2c,

where the relative AUC values for the collective isotopic distribution were compared to the theoretical value.