Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  452 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 452 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

6

Veri cation of the Simultaneous Analysis of Heroin Addiction Treatment Compounds Using LC/MS/MS with a New Prelude SPLC

System

Conclusion

All 8 compounds show excellent verification results using the Prelude SPLC

system in combination with the TSQ Vantage MS. With quality control RSD

percentages less than 10% and correlation coefficient values of 0.9924 to 0.9995,

these verification analyses are proven to be very successful.

Due to the low volume and low solvent consumption capabilities of the Prelude

SPLC system, these compounds were analyzed for research in less time, using

less solvent, and with reduced cost to a standard HPLC system

The design of the Prelude SPLC system allows for efficient online sample clean-

up that demonstrates reproducible, reliable data for all analytes, with a total

injection time that less than 6 minutes.

For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.

All trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries. This information is not intended to

encourage use of these products in any manners that might infringe the intellectual property rights of others.

nalytes

.

Table 3. Quality control data summary.

Table 3 shows the resulting quality control data from the interday and intraday accuracy

and precision. Three consecutive days of runs were summarized to show the ending RSD

percentages. All compounds had RSD values of ≤10% of the expected concentrations

showing excellent accuracy and precision. The third column in the table shows the

expected QC value with column 4, 5, and 6, showing the QC averages (run in replicates of

5) for each day. Then, in column 7, the overall average is calculated along with the

standard deviation (SD) in column 8. Lastly, the %RSD can be seen in column 9.

naltrexone

naloxone

hadone

EDDP

Analyte

(ng/mL) Expected Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Average SD %RSD

buprenorphine

Low QC

3.00

3.05 2.81 2.79

3.0

0.1

3.3

Mid QC

40.0

36.4 38.7 40.0

38.0

1.8

4.7

High QC

80.0

71.0 79.3 79.8

77.0

4.9

6.4

norbuprenorphine

Low QC

3.00

2.89 3.18 3.27

3.0

0.2

6.7

Mid QC

40.0

37.4 39.1 37.8

38.0

0.9

2.4

High QC

80.0

76.5 76.6 77.6

77.0

0.6

0.8

buprenorphine

Low QC

3.00

3.31 2.88 2.86

3.0

0.3 10.0

glucuronide

Mid QC

40.0

36.3 39.4 39.5

38.0

1.8

4.7

High QC

80.0

74.3 79.8 80.9

78.0

3.5

4.5

norbuprenorphine

Low QC

3.00

2.74 3.18 3.01

3.0

0.2

6.7

glucuronide

Mid QC

40.0

37.8 38.8 38.7

38.0

0.5

1.3

High QC

80.0

77.1 76.8 79.2

78.0

1.3

1.7

methadone

Low QC

15.0

14.8 15.6 15.1

15.0

0.4

2.7

Mid QC

200

197

202

191

197

5.6

2.8

High QC

400

418

412

409

413

4.9

1.2

EDDP

Low QC

15.0

14.8 14.5 14.6

15.0

0.2

1.3

Mid QC

200

192

200

190

194

5.3

2.7

High QC

400

398

411

399

403

7.1

1.8

naloxone

Low QC

15.0

14.7 15.5 16.5

16.0

0.9

5.6

Mid QC

200

207

196

198

200

6.1

3.1

High QC

400

396

415

387

399

14.6 3.7

naltrexone

Low QC

15.0

14.7 15.4 15.2

15.0

0.4

2.7

Mid QC

200

201

192

194

195

4.8

2.5

High QC

400

383

405

382

390

12.9 3.3

the highest standard in the

f quantitation (ULOQ). This

over for each analyte. The

of the LLOQ signal. All

interest with one exception:

but this is still well within the

naltrexone

naloxone

methadone

EDDP

injected after the ULOQ.