Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  458 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 458 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

4

Quantitative Confirmatory Analysis of the NIDA 5 Panel Using Prelude SPLC System and TSQ Quantum Ultra MS

ithin SAMHSA/NIDA guidelines. The

mpounds were lower than required to

linear ranges were 2.5-2000 ng/mL for

thamphetamine, BE and 6-MAM;

e, amphetamine, MDA, and MDMA

n was <13.5%, <3.5%, <14.1%, <6.9%, <

CA, opiates and amphetamines

ion was <8.9%, <3.6%, <10.9%, <8.8%,

HCA, opiates and amphetamines

arized in Table 2. Limited matrix effects

diated by deuterated internal standards.

ne donor samples was in range of

opiates with developed methods

tory data with coefficient of correlation

he dual channel Prelude SPLC system

on time precision, chromatographic peaks

or short, small solvent consumption LC

a quality.

TABLE 2. Intra-method and Inter

morphine and codeine.

MRM transitions, cutoff requirements,

FIGURE 2. Representative calibration curves for BE, THCA, 6-MAM and

PCP.

TABLE 3. Recovery of 11 drugs i

Urine Lot

1

2

Amphetamine

100

103

MDEA

94.8

99.9

MDA

99.6

107

MDMA

101

100

Methamphetamine 99.8

101

Benzoylecgonine 106

111

Phencyclidine

88

84.2

6-Acetylmorphine 117

109

THCA

95.8

90.2

Morphine

96.1

99.8

Codeine

102

100

0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6

Time (min)

0

Intensity

Oxymorphon

e

Morphine

Codeine

Hydrocodone

Oxycodon

e

Hydromorphon

e

Compound

Intra-me

LQC

MQC

Amphetamine

<15.9 <3.6

MDEA

<5.33 <3.4

MDA

<6.66 <4.1

MDMA

<5.52 <4.3

Methamphetamine <5.47 <4.5

Benzoylecgonine <2.21 <2.3

Phencyclidine

<6.88 <3.5

6-Acetylmorphine <5.87 <3.3

THCA

<7

<2.8

Morphine

<8.2

<10.

Codeine

<7.35 <5.2

er)

Cutoff (ng/

mL)

LOQ (ng/

mL)

Linear Range

-119.3

250

10

10-5000

-119.2

250

5

5-5000

2-163.2 250

10

10-5000

1-135.1

250

10

10-5000

1-135.2 250

10

10-5000

1-105.1 100

5

5-2000

3-308.3

15

2.5

2.5-2000

.1-105.1

25

2.5

2.5-2000

),

2000

10

10-6000

2-165.1

2000

10

10-6000

1-211.1

10

5

5-2000

FIGURE 3. Example chromatograms for each method at respective LOQs.

Time (min)

00.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

Intensit

y

PCP

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

Time (min)

0

Intensity

MDEA

MDA

Amphetamin

e

MDMA

Methamphetami

ne

THCA

0.0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.1.21.31.4

Time (min)

Intensity

6-MAM

0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0

Time (min)

Intensity

BE

0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0

Time (min)

Intensity

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Area Ratio

Concentration (ng/mL)

Benzoylecgonine


Y = 9.908e-3X-2.91e-3;R^2: 0.9933;

Origin:Ignore

;W:

1/X^2;Area

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Area Ratio

Concentration (ng/mL)

THCA


Y = 1.204e-2X-1.232e-2;R^2: 0.9994;

Origin:Ignore

;W:1/X;Area

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Area Ratio

Concentration (ng/mL)

Phencyclidine


Y = 8.447e-3X-1.847e-3;R^2: 0.9916;

Origin:Ignore

;W:1/X^2;Area

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Area Ratio

Concentration (ng/mL)

6-MAM


Y = 1.028e-2X-1.267e-2;R^2: 0.9939;

Origin:Ignore

;W:1/X^2;Area