Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  271 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 271 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

THC-COOH Quantification in Urine Using

Dilute and Shoot LC-MS/MS Method for

Forensic Toxicology

Samuele Scurati, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rodano, Italy

Maura Brambilla, Ludovico D’Amato, Paolo Brambilla, University Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of Desio, Desio, Italy

Application

Note: 548

Key Words

• TSQ Quantum

Access MAX

• Accela Pump

• Cannabinoids

• Forensic

Toxicology

Introduction

Cannabis sativa

is a widely used drug of abuse. Tetrahy-

drocannabinol (THC) is the major psychoactive chemical

compound in the cannabis plant. After smoke inhalation,

THC is absorbed and distributed in blood. Subsequently,

it is rapidly metabolized to THC-COOH, conjugated

with glucuronic acid, and excreted through urine. Liquid

chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)

is considered a useful tool to establish the consumption of

cannabis by the assessment of THC-COOH in urine for

forensic toxicology purposes.

Goal

To develop a reliable and fast analytical method for the

quantitative determination of THC-COOH in urine using

a Thermo Scientific TSQ Quantum Access MAX triple

stage quadrupole mass spectrometer.

Experimental

Sample Preparation

A urine sample was hydrolyzed with 10M NaOH and

heated at 60 °C for 15 minutes. The pH was restored with

Fisher Chemical acetic acid. Hydrolyzed samples as well as

calibrators were diluted 1:10 in Fisher Chemical water/ace-

tonitrile (1:1). Then, 10 µL were directly injected. Quan-

titative analysis was performed on the basis of calibration

curves prepared in urine, ranging from 7.8 to 1000 ng/mL.

Calibrators were injected in duplicate.

UHPLC conditions

Liquid chromatography separation was performed using

a Thermo Scientific Accela autosampler and pump. The

sample was injected directly on a Thermo Scientific Hyper-

sil GOLD column (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm). A gradient LC

method used mobile phases A (0.1% aqueous formic acid)

and B (Fisher Chemical Optima LC/MS acetonitrile) at a

flow rate of 300 μL/min. The run time was 6 minutes.

Mass Spectrometry

MS analysis was carried out on a TSQ Quantum Access

MAX™ triple stage quadrupole mass spectrometer

equipped with a Thermo Scientific Ion Max source with

a heated electrospray ionization (HESI) probe. The MS

conditions were as follows:

Scan type:

SRM

Divert valve:

2 - 4 min to source

Selected ions for quantification:

m/z

343

299 + 245 for THC-COOH in

negative mode

Results and Discussion

Figures 1 and 2 show the ion chromatograms of the lowest

and highest calibration points. Excellent linearity

(r

2

= 0.99) fits for the calibration curve were observed over

the range of 7.8-1000 ng/mL urine, with a Coefficient of

Variation (%CV) at the lower end of 6.5%. The limit of

quantitation (LOQ) was established as 7.8 ng/mL in urine.

Figure 4 reports an ion chromatogram of a real urine

sample positive for cannabinoids (225 ng/mL urine), ana-

lyzed as described.

To examine the difference between hydrolyzed and

non-hydrolyzed urine, we analyzed the same urine sample

without the hydrolysis step. When urines were not hy-

drolyzed, the portion excreted as free THC-COOH was

detected at 3.06 minutes, while THC-COOH-glucuronide

was detected at 2.58 minutes (Figure 5). The precursor ion

m/z

343 was generated as result of an in-source fragmenta-

tion and a consequent loss of glucuronic acid.

Because THC-COOH is mainly excreted as glucuronic

acid conjugate, it is always necessary to perform urine

hydrolysis before the LC-MS analysis to obtain an accurate

quantification of THC-COOH.