Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  48 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 48 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

E1

E2

Dilution

Factor

Expected

(pg/mL)

Measured

(mean, pg/mL)

CV (n=3 %) Accuracy

(n=3, %)

Measured

(mean, pg/mL) CV (n=3, %)

Accuracy

(n=3, %)

256

3.9

3.8

5.0

97.8

3.7

11.7

94.6

128

7.8

8.0

9.0

102.9

8.8

13.9

112.3

64

15.6

16.1

5.1

102.8

15.7

7.4

100.4

32

31.3

32.2

8.4

103.2

29.0

7.6

92.7

16

62.5

59.7

0.8

95.5

62.7

4.4

100.3

8

125.0

123.3

9.9

98.7

129.4

9.8

103.5

4

250.0

245.9

7.0

98.4

253.1

3.7

101.2

2

500.0

503.5

2.3

100.7

478.9

4.1

95.8

1

1000.0

1000.9

4.5

100.1

993.1

5.3

99.3

Mean

100.0

100.0

Validation

The validation procedure included tests for 1) recovery

of sample preparation; 2) lower limit of quantitation

(LLOQ), dynamic range, accuracy; 3) precision;

4) ionization suppression; and 5) carryover.

Results and Discussion

Human plasma has endogenous E1 and E2 so it was not

suitable for validation experiments except the precision

study. Therefore, charcoal stripped serum (CSS) is used to

conduct the validation experiments.

Recovery

The absolute recoveries of E1, E2 and IS from CSS samples

compared to spiked neat solutions ranged from 61.2%

to 65.6%. The relative recoveries of E1 and E2 against

IS ranged from 99.0% to 107.1% at the two spiked

concentration levels (20 and 100 pg/mL).

Determination of LLOQ, Linearity and Accuracy

A stock solution of E1 and E2 at 1000 pg/mL was

prepared in CSS. A serial 2-fold dilution with blank

CSS was performed to make 9 levels of linearity samples

with concentrations from 1000 to 3.9 pg/mL for both E1

and E2. Linearity samples were analyzed in triplicate. The

calibration curve was constructed by plotting the

analyte:IS

peak area ratio vs. expected analyte concentration.

The method was linear between 3.8 and 1000.9 pg/mL

with accuracy (n=3) from 95.5% to 103.2% for E1, and

between 3.7 and 993.1 pg/mL with accuracy (n=3) from

92.7% to 112.3% for E2 (Table 1, Figures 2 and 3). The

LLOQ for E1 and E2 are 3.8 and 3.7 pg/mL, respectively

(Table 1 and Figure 4).

Table 1. LLOQ, dynamic range and accuracy