Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  359 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 359 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

Codeine

Y = 32.2427+24.0181*X

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

180000

200000

220000

240000

260000

Area

Morphine

Y = 55.5334+9.08022*X

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

pg on column

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

pg on column

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

pg on column

0

2000

4000

6000

8000 10000

pg on column

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

Area

Norcodeine

Y = 22.9221+11.7412*X

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

110000

120000

Area

6-Acetylmorphine

Y = 54.3108+35.5146*X

R^2 = 0.9961 W: 1/X

R^2 = 0.9974 W: 1/X

R^2 = 0.9967 W: 1/X

R^2 = 0.9965 W: 1/X

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

Area

Conclusions

Rigorous simultaneous characterization

and quantification of a large number

of drugs and their metabolites in a

biological matrix can be performed in

a fast and robust LC-MS/MS method

using an LXQ linear ion trap mass

spectrometer. The superior sensitivity

and faster cycle time of the LXQ

makes this possible in a single chro-

matographic run, resulting in high

throughput analyses. High specificity

quantification was done using MS

3

data

which can reduce overall chemical

noise even if there is a co-eluting

isobaric interfering ion. Additional

compound confirmation was obtained

using Mass Frontier software, where

a high match score to a library search

provided enhanced confidence in the

compound identification.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. C. Murphy

for her assistance and technical discussions.

C. Yang and R. Chen are acknowledged for

suggestion and advice.

References

1

Huestis, M.A.; Cone, E.J.; Wong, C.J.;

Umbricht,A.; Preston, K.L.

J. Anal. Toxicol.

2000, 24, 509-521

2

Dams, R.; Murphy, C.M.; Choo, R.E.;

Lambert,W.E.; De Leenheer, A.P.; Huestis, M.A.

Anal. Chem.

2003, 75, 798-804

Figure 3: Representative calibration curves for eight drugs in oral fluid

Linear

LOD LOQ dynamic

Compound

(pg)

(pg)

range (pg)

Acetylcodeine

0.5

1

1-10000

Heroin

0.5

1

1-10000

Cocaine

0.5

1

1-10000

Norcocaine

0.5

1

1-10000

Cocaethylene

0.5

1

1-10000

Norcocaethylene

0.5

1

1-10000

Methadol

1

5

1-10000

EDDP

0.5

1

1-10000

Propoxyphene

1

5

5-10000

Methadone

0.5

1

1-10000

Linear

LOD LOQ dynamic

Compound

(pg)

(pg)

range (pg)

EEE

1

5

5-5000

Normorphine

5

10

10-10000

AEM

5

10

10-10000

Morphine

5

10

10-10000

Norcodeine

5

10

10-10000

Codeine

1

5

5-10000

6-Acetylmorphine

1

5

5-10000

m-Hydroxybenzoylecgonine

0.2

1

1-2000

Benzoylnorecgonine

0.2

1

1-2000

Benzoylecgonine

0.5

1

1-10000

Table 2: LOD (limit of detection), LOQ (limit of quantification) and linear dynamic range for analysis of 20 drugs and metabolites in oral fluid using the

LXQ linear ion trap mass spectrometer

Methadol

Y = 11.8893+7.8451*X

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

Area

Benzoylnorecgonine

Y = 1.83466+65.2358*X

0

500

1000

1500

2000

pg on column

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

110000

120000

130000

140000

Area

Norcocaethylene

Y = 15.9875+161.756*X

0

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

pg on column

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000

Area

Cocaethylene

Y = 22.1534+178.869*X

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000

1800000

Area

0

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

pg on column

0

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

pg on column

R^2 = 0.9977 W: 1/X

R^2 = 0.9977 W: 1/X

R^2 = 0.9978 W: 1/X

R^2 = 0.9986 W: 1/X