Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  319 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 319 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

A Quantitative Test for Multiple Classes of Illicit

Drugs and Their Primary Metabolites in Human

Biological Fluids by LC-MS/MS for Forensic Use

Kevin J. McHale,

1

Joyce Ho,

2

and Angela Springfield

2

1

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Somerset, NJ, USA;

2

Tarrant County Medical Examiner, Fort Worth, TX, USA

Application

Note: 390

Key Words

• TSQ Quantum

Discovery MAX

• Surveyor HPLC

• Forensic drugs

of abuse testing

• SRM

Introduction

Currently, GC/MS is the method of choice for quantifying

drugs of abuse. In recent years, however, many forensic

labs have been switching to LC-MS/MS methods, which

do not require time-consuming derivatization or extensive

sample cleanup necessary in GC/MS analyses. Yet, many

of the LC-MS/MS methods described in the literature

either assay a limited number of illicit drug classes or do

not include their primary metabolites

of these illicit drugs (see table 1).

1-5

Herein is described a

method to assay multiple drugs of abuse including opiates,

stimulants, depressants, and the primary metabolites of

these illicit drugs.

Goal

To apply a single LC-MS/MS method to screen for 32

illicit drugs of abuse and their metabolites in biological

fluids.

Experimental Conditions

Sample Preparation

Whole blood or urine samples (0.1–0.4 mL) were spiked

with 20 ng of isotopically labeled internal standards and

purified by solid phase extraction (SPE). Extracted

samples were reconstituted to yield solutions with the

internal standards at 25 ng/mL.

HPLC

HPLC analysis was performed using the Thermo

Scientific Surveyor HPLC System. Each 10 µL sample

was injected directly onto a Thermo Scientific Hypersil

GOLD PFP 50

×

2.1 mm, 3 µm analytical column.

A gradient LC method used mobile phases A (0.1%

formic acid in water) and B (0.1% formic acid in

acetonitrile) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min.

Mass Spectrometry

MS analysis was carried out on a Thermo Scientific

TSQ Quantum Discovery MAX triple stage quadru-

pole mass spectrometer with an electrospray ionization

(ESI) probe. The MS conditions were as follows:

Ion source polarity: Positive ion mode

Ion transfer tube temperature: 370°C

Scan Type: SRM

SRM scan time: 10 ms per transition

Q1, Q3 resolution: unit (0.7 Da FWHM)

Two SRM transitions were monitored for each

component to provide ion ratio confirmations (IRC).

Table 1 summarizes these SRM transitions.

Ra o

EE

DD

CC

BB

AA

Z

Y

X

W

V

U

T

S

R

Q

P

O

N

M

L

K

J

I

H

G

F

E

D

C

B

A

18

105

265

310

Methadone

34

239

268

314

Flunitrazepam

15

82

196

318

Cocaethylene

70

154

193

285

Diazepam

28

214

270

316

Clonazepam

11.8

177

255

301

Temazepam

85

205

281

309

Alprazolam

38

180

236

282

Nitrazepam

25

229

275

321

Lorazepam

11.1

82

182

304

Cocaine

82

208

140

271

Nordiazepam

54

269

241

287

Oxazepam

55

174

220

248

Meperidine

32

135

163

208

MDEA

40

179

125

238

Ketamine

30

135

163

194

MDMA

52

227

135

284

7-amino-flunitrazepam

24

105

168

290

Benzoylecgonine

28

171

199

300

Hydrocodone

43

179

125

224

Norketamine

68

211

165

328

6-MAM

92

105

135

180

MDA

65

256

241

316

Oxycodone

67

119

91

150

Methamphetamine

97

227

187

302

Noroxycodone

85

250

222

286

7-amino-clonazepam

97

215

165

300

Codeine

86

91

119

136

Amphetamine

56

157

185

286

Hydromorphone

95

133

115

166

Ephedrine

14.5

94

121

252

7-amino-nitrazepam

87

165

201

286

Morphine

Qualifier

Parent

m

/

z

Drug of Abuse

FF

Ion

ti

Quantifier

Product

m/z

Product

m/z

Table 1: Summary of SRM transitions for 32 illicit drugs.

DOWNLOAD