Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  16 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

2

Table 1. LC gradient

Mass Spectrometry

MS analysis was performed on a Thermo Scientific

TSQ

Quantiva

triple-stage quadrupole mass spectrometer

(Figure 1). The MS conditions were as follows:

Ionization:

Heated electrospray

ionization (HESI)

Vaporizer temp (°C):

500

Capillary temp (°C):

375

Spray Voltage (V):

800

Sheath gas (AU):

55

Auxiliary gas (AU):

25

Data acquisition mode:

Selected reaction monitoring (SRM)

Chrom filter peak width (s):

3

Collision gas pressure (mTorr):

2

Cycle time (s):

0.2

Q1 (FWMH):

0.7

Q3 (FWMH):

0.7

SRM parameters:

Refer to Table 2

Table 2. Optimized SRM parameters

Method Evaluation

Calibration standards were prepared in charcoal stripped

serum (CSS) (Bioreclamation, LLC) at concentrations of

5, 10, 20, 40, 100, 200, and 500 pg/mL. QC samples

were prepared in CSS at 10 and 50 pg/mL. Intra-assay

precision was obtained by processing and analyzing a

standard curve along with three replicates of each QC

sample. Inter-assay precision was obtained by processing

and analyzing a standard curve along with three replicates

of each QC samples on three different days. Matrix effects

were evaluated by comparing peak areas of a 25 pg/mL

sample prepared in CSS to a sample prepared in

reconstitution solution. Matrix effects in different lots of

plasma were evaluated by comparing the internal

standard signal in donor plasma samples to the internal

standard signal in solvent matrix.

Data Processing

Data was processed with Thermo Scientific

TraceFinder

software version 3.1. The target ion ratio was calculated

by averaging the values obtained for calibrators and

applying a tolerance of 20% for QC and donor samples.

Results and Discussion

The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 5 pg/mL, equivalent

to 100 fg on column, with excellent signal-to-noise. The

LOQ was limited by the presence of endogenous

testosterone in CSS (about 1 pg/mL). Figure 2 shows

chromatograms for testosterone quantifier and qualifier

ions at a concentration of 5 pg/mL in CSS. The calibration

range is 5–500 pg/mL. Figure 3 shows a representative

calibration curve. Intra-assay precision was better than

3.4% RSD for the 10 pg/mL QC and 2.0% RSD for the

50 pg/mL QC (Table 3). Inter-assay precision was 2.4%

and 4.6% RSD for the 10 and 50 pg/mL QCs, respectively.

Matrix effects in CSS were not observed. The average

percentage recovery calculated against the spiked solvent

was 94.8%. Limited matrix effects were observed in

donor plasma. Internal standard signal in donor plasma

was about 30% lower when compared to signal in solvent

samples. Ion ratios passed for all calibration standards,

QCs, and donor samples. Figures 4 and 5 present a

TraceFinder chromatogram and calculated ion ratio for

selected donor samples obtained in separate analytical

runs.

Time

(min)

A

(%)

B

(%)

C

(%)

Flow Rate

(µL/min)

0.00

95

5

0

400

0.10

60

40

0

400

3.60

20

80

0

400

3.61

0

100

0

400

4.60

0

100

0

400

4.61

0

0

100

800

5.00

0

0

100

800

5.01

95

5

0

600

6.50

95

5

0

600

Analyte

Q1

(

m/z

)

Q3

(

m/z

)

CE

(V)

Testosterone

289.1

97.1

109.1

30

30

Testosterone-D

3

292.1

97.1

109.1

30

30