Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  582 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 582 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

4

Real-Time Qualitative and Quantitative Global Proteomics Profiling Using a Hybrid Data Acquisition Scheme

ion strategy, experimental analysis

ed to standard DIA data. The

ribed above. In addition to spectral

ibility and quantitative capabilities

prehensive list of plasma peptides

at BRIMS over the course of two

ptides contains the sequence (with

, precursor charge states, product

n. A custom script was used to

ard DIA and pSMART data to

f identified peptides per injection.

e overlap, precursor/product ion

experimental product ion

tolerance values were set to 10 ppm

r. Standard DIA data was

es, 10 and 20 ppm and a CS score

evaluated the consecutive spectral

The final list of identified peptides

tation and variance analysis across

atabase was created and used for

ry was used to create two different

ated by switching precursors and

ch must have similar retention times

0 Da. The second decoy database

bundance values per fragment ion.

e criteria as that for the forward

Three technical replicates we

data analysis generates a list

compared across each replic

reproducibility. The peptide n

peptides identified across all t

reproducibility of peptides ide

identified across all pSMART,

another 75 peptides identified

2159 peptides from the all re

three technical replicates and

Of further interest was deter

methods as well as those pe

peptides per method were co

FIGURE 3. Venn diagram c

used to sample the plasma

technical replicates to be c

FIGURE 4. Comparative ma

SLAELGGHLDQQVEEFR th

shows the overlaid precurs

shows the isotopic distribut

matched narrow DIA windo

the PRM experiment. The in

distribution. C) shows the

experiment. The inset show

data set as compared to the

T data acquisition strategy

sed for quantitative peptide

trical DIA acquisition for

). (1A) User defined loop count

rsor m/z range, individual DIA

s dictate total DIA acquisition

me is displayed in Fig. 1B

ead in from the Crystal Spectral

IA window acquired under the

Retention Time

MS

Expected Retention Time

32.5

33

33.5

34

34.5

Normalized Intensity

Retention Time

ISASAEELR

100

(8.E+06)

100

A

B

Standard DIA

pSMART

(7.E+05)

MS1

DIA

MSMS

C

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Normalized Intensity

m/z(ion)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Abundance

m/z

Precursor Ion Isotopic Distribution

D

Library

pSMART

DIA

Theoretical

Experimental

FIGURE 2. Comparative targeted peptide analysis using standard DIA and

pSMART methods for the plasma peptide ISASAEELR. (A) Shows the product

ion XIC results from the standard DIA dataset compared to (B) which shows the

precursor ion XIC results used to determine elution profile, qualitative analysis,

and quantitation. The dashed line shows the RT point for matched DIA

spectrum for the targeted peptide. Fig. C shows comparative product ion

distribution analysis for DIA and pSMART as well as the product ion

distribution read in from Crystal. Successful matching is based on CS scores

in excess of 0.7 as compared to library product ion distribution. CS scores for

DIA is 0.87 compared to 0.81 for pSMART. CS scores for DIA are based on

relative product ion AUC values whereas the single narrow DIA spectrum is

used to calculate the CS score.

TABLE 1. List of comparative peptide hits using different data processing

strategies. Each column lists the forward and decoy hit rates per data set and

acceptance criteria used for processing. Mass tolerance criteria used for

pSMART data (MS and DIA) was 10 ppm. Decoy libraries used to search

experimental data are described above.

83

84

85

0

0

100

100

pSMART

PRM

Standard D

Relative Abundance

Library

A secondary set of PRM expe

performed to target the uniqu

identified per acquisition sche

targeted inclusion list of 536 p

(standard DIA), 656 from pSM

724 peptides identified by all t

experiments as a control. Th

each PRM analysis showed o

the 724 peptides verified acro

methods were confirmed usin

85% of the peptides were con

the pSMART method, and les

of the unique peptides identifi

standard DIA were confirmed

experiment. An example of th

comparative data analysis str

presented in Figure 4.

A

B

C

Peptide

IDStrategy

Standard DIA

20ppm

6 data point

across peak

Standard DIA

20ppm

4 data point

across peak

Standard DIA

10ppM

6 data point

across peak

Standard DIA

10ppm

4 data point

across peak

pSMART

(10ppm)

Library Hits

2159

3034

1645

2244

2525

Decoy library

#1 Hits

983

1790

503

897

287

Decoy library

#2 Hits

515

996

182

363

149

Decoy Hit

Rate (#1)

46%

59%

31%

40%

11%

Decoy Hit

Rate (#2)

24%

33%

11%

16%

6%