Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  394 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 394 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

2

Quantitation of 47 Forensic Compounds in Urine by HPLC-MS

Overview

Purpose:

To demonstrate analytical workflow for robust, fast and cost efficient analysis

of large panel of drugs in urine samples.

Methods:

Hydrolyzed and diluted urine samples were analyzed with 8 minute LC-MS

method on a dual channel LC system coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometer.

Results:

We demonstrated simple and cost efficient method producing data which

meet forensic toxicology lab requirements for sensitivity and robustness.

Introduction

Forensic toxicologists face an ever-expanding list of compounds for analysis. The need

to reliably quantitate large-panel assays with ion ratio confirmation is continually

increasing. Large panel assays are required in order to speed sample analysis time,

lower analytical costs and obtain results quicker while keeping good data quality.

Methods

Sample Preparation

•Take a 200-µL aliquot of urine sample.

•Add 100 µL

β

-glucuronidase and incubate 2 hours at 60 C.

•Cool samples and add 100 µL of Internal Standard spiking solution in methanol.

•Vortex and then centrifuge.

•Dilute sample 15 fold with water to minimize matrix effects.

•Inject 10 µL onto analytical column.

Note: Deuterated analogs of each analyte were used as internal standards.

Liquid Chromatography

•Column: Thermo Scientific ™Accucore

TM

PFP 2.6 µm , 5 0x 2.1 mm

•Mobile phase:

•A: 10 mM ammonium formate, 0.1% formic acid in water (Fisher

Scientific™Optima™ LC/MS)

•B: 10 mM ammonium formate, 0.1% formic acid in methanol water

((Fisher Scientific™ Optima™ LC/MS)

•Ambient temperature

•LC Gradient (Table 1)

Table 1. Liquid chromatography program for the method, including solvent

composition, flow rate, and timing

Results

Mass Spectrometry

A Thermo Scientific™ TSQ Endura™ triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with a

HESI ionization probe in polarity switch mode was used as the detector. Two SRM

transitions were collected for each analyte, and one SRM transition was collected for

each internal standard. The SRM transitions collection time scheme is presented in

Figure 1.

Data Analysis

All data acquisition and quantification for this method was performed using Thermo

Scientific ™ TraceFinder™ software version 3.2.

Step

Start

(min)

Time

(s)

Flow

(mL/min)

%A

%B

1

0.00

30

0.5

100.0

0

2

0.5

30

0.5

80

20

3

1.0

180

0.5

30

70

4

3

120

0.5

0

100

5

5

6

1.0

0

100

6

5.01

114

1

-

100.0

7

7.0

6

1

100

0

8

7.01

54

1

100

0

Method Performance E

Calibration standards an

Concentration of the high

individual analytes stock

The following method per

LOQ:

precision within

Linearity range

: all cali

Precision:

5 replicates

Matrix effects

: Internal

calculated against interna

Figure 1.

SRM transition

Deuterated internal stand

analyzed with the same a

Figure 1. Calibration cu

standards showing qu

Morphine

nicotine

Zonisamide-neg

Zonisamide

Oxymorphone

Hydromorphone

7-aminoclonazepam

Meprobamate

phenobarbital

Benzoylecgonine

gabapentin

codeine

Pregabalin

6 MAM

noroxycodone

butalbital

Oxycodone

7-aminoclonazepam

2-1000 ng/mL

Morphine

50-1000 ng/mL

7-aminoclonazepam

2-1000 ng/mL