Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  291 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 291 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

Quantitation of Six Synthetic Opioids

in Urine Using a Triple Stage Quadrupole

LC-MS System

Kristine Van Natta, Marta Kozak; Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA

Introduction

Synthetic opioids have analgesic, antitussive and anti-

addictive effects. However, they are also abused for their

psychoactive effects and are often diverted from lawful

prescriptions to unlawful recreational use. Simple, robust

and precise analytical methods are needed to quantify

these compounds in biological matrices for forensic

purposes.

Goal

To develop a specific and robust dilute and shoot quan-

titative method for the analysis of six synthetic opioids

and their primary metabolites in urine. These compounds

include: methadone, EDDP, merperidine, normeperidine,

propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene.

Methods

Sample Preparation

Urine was mixed with methanol containing deuterated

analog internal standards. The supernatant was diluted

with water prior to liquid chromatography-mass

spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis.

HPLC Conditions

Chromatographic analysis was performed using Thermo

Scientific Accela 600 HPLC pumps and a Thermo

Scientific Hypersil GOLD aQ column (50 x 4.6 mm,

1.9 µm particle size). The total run time was 5 minutes.

MS Conditions

MS analysis was carried out on a Thermo Scientific

TSQ Quantum Ultra triple stage quadrupole mass

spectrometer equipped with a heated electrospray

ionization (HESI-II) probe. Two selected reaction

monitoring (SRM) transitions were monitored for each

compound to provide ion ratio confirmations (IRC).

Application

Note: 545

Key Words

• TSQ Quantum

Ultra

• Transcend

LX-2 system

• Forensic

Toxicology

Validation

Standard curves were prepared by fortifying pooled blank

human urine with analytes. Quality control (QC) samples

were prepared in a similar manner at concentrations

corresponding to the low (LQC), a middle (MQC) and

high (HQC) end of the calibration range. Intra- and

Inter- run variability and robustness were determined

by analyzing five replicates of each QC level with a

calibration curve on three different days. Matrix effects

were investigated by spiking seven different lots of human

urine with analytes at 50 ng/mL and calculating peak area

recovery.

Results and Discussion

The method is linear from 20 to 5,000 ng/mL with

R

2

values > 0.99 for all six compounds. Figure 1 shows

the representative calibration curves. All IRCs passed

within 20% of the standards average. All calibrators back

calculate to within 15% of nominal, 20% for the limit of

quantitation (LOQ). All quality controls quantitated to

within 15% of nominal for the middle and high controls

and within 20% for the low control. Inter-assay %CV was

less than 10% for all QC levels. Table 1 shows quality

control statistics for the validation runs.

No matrix effects were observed during validation.

All samples showed recoveries within 20% of nominal.

Internal standard variation was less than 5% between the

different lots. Table 2 shows matrix effects testing results.

Figure 2 shows a reconstructed SRM chromatogram

at LOQ.