Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  216 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 216 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

2

Two selected-reaction monitoring (SRM) transitions were

monitored for EtG, EtS and their deuterated internal

standards to provide ion ratio confirmations (IRC). The

scans were run in timed selected-reaction monitoring

(t-SRM) mode with a cycle time of 0.25 seconds. In this

mode, SRM transitions are given a retention time and

window in which the mass spectrometer acquires the

specified transitions only. This allows the instrument to

maximize the amount of time spent acquiring each

transition, while maintaining a consistent number of

data points across the chromatographic peak.

Data was acquired and processed with

Thermo Scientific TraceFinder software.

Validation

Intra-assay precision and accuracy were determined by

analyzing a calibration curve along with six replicates of

quality control (QC) samples. Inter-assay precision and

accuracy were determined by analyzing a calibration

curve along with six replicates of QC samples on three

different days. Matrix effects were evaluated by observing

the internal standard signals in 23 different lots of human

urine.

Results

Both compounds were linear over a wide dynamic range.

EtG was linear from 50 to 50,000 ng/mL, while EtS had a

range of 25 to 50,000 ng/mL. Figure 2 shows representative

calibration curves for both compounds. Figure 3 shows

representative chromatograms for EtG and EtS at their

respective LOQs.

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

Area Ratio

ng/mL

EtG

Y = 1.852e-4X + 1.709e-2; R^2: 0.9953; Origin: Ignore; W: 1/X; Area

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Area Ratio

Theoretical

Calculated

%Diff

50

54.962

9.92

100

97.747

-2.25

250

266.942

6.78

500

470.273

-5.95

1000

854.373

-14.6

5000

5450.4

9.01

10000

9705.303

-2.95

Figure 2. Representative calibration curves for EtG (top) and EtS (bottom) in urine

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

Area Ratio

ng/mL

EtS

Y + 1.687e-3X + 2.021e-1; R^2: 0.9985; Origin: Ignore; W: 1/X; Area

Theoretical

Calculated

%Diff

25

22.269

-10.9

50

50.799

11.6

100

108.127

8.13

250

272.582

9.03

500

519.572

3.91

1000

890.546

-10.9

5000

4855.946

-2.88

10000

10204.859

2.05

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

Area Ratio

ng/mL

EtG

Y = 1.852e-4X + 1.709e-2; R^2: 0.9953; Origin: Ignore; W: 1/X; Area

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Area Ratio

ng/mL

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

Area Ratio

ng/mL

EtS

Y + 1.687e-3X + 2.021e-1; R^2: 0.9985; Origin: Ignore; W: 1/X; Area

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Area Ratio

ng/mL