Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  80 / 302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 80 / 302 Next Page
Page Background

2

Quantitative and Semi-Quantitative Determination of PPCPs and Their By-products in Wastewater Treatment Plants Samples Using UHPLC-Orbitrap MS

and Data Mining Technologies

Overview

Purpose:

Develop an analytical method to (1) determine PPCP concentrations in

wastewater samples, and (2) examine the transformation of selected PPCPs during

treatment processes.

Methods:

Samples prepared by solid phase extraction (SPE) and analyzed by high

performance liquid chromatography-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (HPLC-Orbitrap MS).

Results:

Quantitative results of selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products

(PPCPs) like DEET, Triclosan (TCS), Triclocarban (TCC), Diclofenac (DCL),

Carbamazepine (CBZ) and semi-quantitative of their degradation products were

obtained.

Introduction

Results obtained from a simple and powerful workflow that can readily determine

PPCPs and their by-products in wastewater treatment plant (WWTPs) samples will be

presented. This workflow was applied in a survey of 43 permeate samples obtained

from a pilot anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). Quantitative results show the

prevalence of various PPCPs in wastewater, particularly for compounds with high

usage and/or poor elimination (e.g., caffeine, carbamazepine (CBZ), DEET, lidocaine,

lincomycin, ketoprofen, and bezafibrate). For PPCP by-products, we identified that in-

situ microbial degradation was the dominant pathway for triclocarban (TCC) removal;

whilst triclosan (TCS), diclofenac (DCF) and CBZ were eliminated via a combination of

photodegradation and metabolism. Thirty by-products were detected in this pilot

survey, including the toxic compounds chlorophenol and acridone.

Methods

Sample Preparation

For this study, permeate samples were chosen due to their complex matrix which

poses as a challenge for conventional analytical method. These samples were

collected from a pilot anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) pilot plant located at

the Wastewater Technology Centre (Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario). A total

of 35 permeate samples permeate tank from January 2012 to March 2013. During this

time, the reactor were operated at different temperatures at 20, 35 and 55 °C using

samples collected, respectively, in summer, winter and winter, to investigate the effect

on the removal of PPCPs in permeates. Grab samples were contained in 1L-amber

bottles without headspace and stored in dark, cold storage (4°C) until analysis.

Neat standards of native target compounds were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich

(Oakville, ON, Canada). Deuterium (D) and

13

C-labelled standards were purchased

from CDN Isotopes (Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) and Cambridge isotope Laboratories

(Andover, MA, US). Five levels of analytical standard solutions were prepared by

diluting intermediate solutions with CH

3

OH HPLC grade acetonitrile (CH

3

CN) and

methanol (CH

3

OH) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Ottawa, ON,

Canada). High purity water used for aqueous mobile phases and sample preparation

was produced by passing reverse osmosis water through a Thermo

Scientific™

Barnstead™

Nanopure

water purification system (Mississauga, ON, Canada).

Laboratory Services NBranch (LaSB) method E3454

1

was used to prepare samples for

targeted compound analysis and non-targeted compound screening. Waters OASIS®

(Mississauga, ON, Canada) HLB solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (6 cc, 500 mg)

was used in the extraction. Method E3454 has been accredited by the Canadian

Association for Laboratory Accreditation (CALA) since 2004.

Liquid Chromatography (or more generically Separations)

Sample analysis was achieved on a Thermo

Scientific™

Dionex™

UltiMate

3000

HPLC consisting of a HRG-3400RS binary pump, WPS-3000 autosampler, and a TCC-

3400 column compartment. Separation was made by injecting 5

m

L extracts into a

Thermo

Scientific™

Betasil

and a Thermo

Scientific™

Hypersil

Gold, 2.1x100 mm

columns, respectively, for positive and negative mode Orbitrap MS analysis.

One positive mode HPLC a

analysis of PPCPs and their

TABLE 1. HPLC mobile ph

Mass Spectrometry

The HPLC

was interfaced t

a heated electrospray ioniz

and calibrated in positive an

MSCAL5 and MSCAL6. Hig

L/min). Spray voltages used

Mass spectrometric data w

width-at-half-maximum pea

1.5 scans/sec when using a

time of 100 msec.

Data Analysis

Thermo

Scientific™

Trac

analysis for 56 PPCPs. Th

screening along with a dat

active compounds and t

perfluorohydrocarbons. Tr

(M+H)

+

, (M+NH

4

)

+

and (M+

negative mode for compou

extracted ion chromatogra

Analytes were automatica

(approximately 25

50 pg/m

for the mono-isotopic mass

a relative intensity of 90%

was about 65 sec/sample

TraceFinder software were

carry out ChemSpider

se

the SIEVE software

too.

Results

Quantitative Analytical Re

Quantitative analysis deter

antibiotics, non-steroidal a

products such as insect re

ciprofloxacin and sulfa drug

to other therapeutic classes

is reported for the antide

representative (i.e., CBZ), it

Column oven

Mobile phase (Positive)

Mobile phase (Negative I)

Mobile phase (Negative II)

HPLC Gradient