Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  81 / 302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 81 / 302 Next Page
Page Background

3

Thermo Scientific Poster Note

PN-64109-ASMS-EN-0614S

ne PPCP concentrations in

of selected PPCPs during

E) and analyzed by high

metry (HPLC-Orbitrap MS).

and personal care products

iclofenac (DCL),

dation products were

can readily determine

t (WWTPs) samples will be

meate samples obtained

ntitative results show the

r compounds with high

ne (CBZ), DEET, lidocaine,

ducts, we identified that in-

iclocarban (TCC) removal;

inated via a combination of

detected in this pilot

ridone.

their complex matrix which

hod. These samples were

nMBR) pilot plant located at

, Burlington, Ontario). A total

2 to March 2013. During this

at 20, 35 and 55 °C using

nter, to investigate the effect

were contained in 1L-amber

(4°C) until analysis.

chased from Sigma-Aldrich

standards were purchased

bridge isotope Laboratories

solutions were prepared by

e acetonitrile (CH

3

CN) and

er Scientific (Ottawa, ON,

ses and sample preparation

ugh a Thermo

Scientific™

ississauga, ON, Canada).

used to prepare samples for

screening. Waters OASIS®

PE) cartridge (6 cc, 500 mg)

ccredited by the Canadian

4.

ns)

Dionex™

UltiMate

3000

00 autosampler, and a TCC-

jecting 5

m

L extracts into a

ypersil

Gold, 2.1x100 mm

trap MS analysis.

One positive mode HPLC and two negative mode HPLC separations were used for the

analysis of PPCPs and their by-products.

TABLE 1. HPLC mobile phase and gradient used in the analysis

Mass Spectrometry

The HPLC

was interfaced to a Thermo Scientific™ Exactive Plus™

Orbitrap MS using

a heated electrospray ionization (HESI) interface. The Orbitrap MS system was tuned

and calibrated in positive and negative modes by infusion of standard mixtures of

MSCAL5 and MSCAL6. High purity nitrogen (>99%) was used in the ESI source (35

L/min). Spray voltages used were 2500 and 3200 V for positive and negative modes.

Mass spectrometric data was acquired at a resolving power of 140000 (defined as full-

width-at-half-maximum peakwidth at

m/z

200, R

FWHM

), resulting a scanning rate of >

1.5 scans/sec when using automatic gain control target of 1.0 x 10

6

and a C-trap inject

time of 100 msec.

Data Analysis

Thermo

Scientific™

TraceFinder

software were used to perform quantitative

analysis for 56 PPCPs. The same software was also used to perform non-targeted

screening along with a database of 312 compounds consisting of pharmaceutically

active compounds and their metabolites, steroids, hormones, surfactants and

perfluorohydrocarbons. TraceFinder software is used to search for adduct ions

(M+H)

+

, (M+NH

4

)

+

and (M+Na)

+

in the positive mode and (M-H)

molecular ion in the

negative mode for compounds listed in the database. The software then creates an

extracted ion chromatogram (XIC) using a mass extraction window (MEW) of 5 ppm.

Analytes were automatically identified using an XIC area threshold of 50,000

(approximately 25

50 pg/mL (ppt) depending on compound), a 5 ppm mass accuracy

for the mono-isotopic mass (M) and at least two isotopic peaks ((M+1) and (M+2)), and

a relative intensity of 90% ± 10% from the theoretical values. Typical screening time

was about 65 sec/sample using the 312 CEC database. Results obtained from

TraceFinder software were also exported to Thermo

Scientific™

SIEVE

software to

carry out ChemSpider

search. Principal component analysis was carried out using

the SIEVE software

too.

Results

Quantitative Analytical Results

Quantitative analysis determined 43 target PPCPs comprised of pharmaceuticals like

antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID); as well as personal care

products such as insect repellent and antimicrobial agents (Table 2). Antibiotics (e.g.

ciprofloxacin and sulfa drugs) found have the lowest median concentration compared

to other therapeutic classes. As depicted in Figure 1, the highest median concentration

is reported for the antidepressant drug; however since this group only has one

representative (i.e., CBZ), it is difficult to draw any conclusion.

FIGURE 1. Median concentr

Column oven temperature: 35

°

C; Flow rate: 450 mL/min

Mobile phase (Positive)

A: 5 mM HCOONH

4

/0.1% HCOOH in 10:90/CH

3

OH:H

2

O

B: 90:10/CH

3

OH:H

2

O

Mobile phase (Negative I) A: 10:90/CH

3

CN:H2O, pH 6.95

±

0.3

B: CH

3

CN

Mobile phase (Negative II) A: 5 mM CH

3

COONH

4

in 10:90/CH

3

CN:H2O, pH 6.95

±

0.3

B: CH

3

CN

HPLC Gradient

Time (min)

% A

% B

Curve

0.0

95

5

5

2.0

25

75

5

10.0

5

95

7

15.0

5

95

5

15.2

95

5

5

Compound

Name

Usage

Caffeine

Stimulant

Carbamazepine

Antiepileptic/antid

DEET

insect repellent

Lidocaine

anesthetic/anti-arr

Lincomycin

Antibiotic

Ketoprofen

analgesic/anti-infl

Bezafibrate

lipid regulator

Sulfamethazine

Antibiotic

Bisphenol A

commercial additi

Acetaminophen

analgesic/anti-infl

Diclofenac

analgesic/anti-infl

Norfloxacin

antibiotic

Triclocarban

antimicrobial/antif

Triclosan

antibacterial/antif

Estrone

estrogen

Oxolinic acid

antibiotic

Oxybenzone

sunscreen

Norethindrone

ovulation inhibitor

Ciprofloxacin

antibiotic

Estriol

estrogen

Ibuprofen

analgesic/anti-infl

TABLE 2. Quantitative resu

samples analyzed

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

Concentration (ng/L)