Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  56 / 302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 56 / 302 Next Page
Page Background

6

Analysis of Diquat and Paraquat Using UHPLC Orbitrap MS – Method Development, Matrix Effects and Performance

Conclusion

It is demonstrated that high-resolution and high-sensitivity analysis of PQ and DQ can

be carried out using UHPLC Orbitrap MS coupled with an Acclaim Trinity Q1 column.

This method provides the following benefits:

A fast LC, isocratic separation of PQ and DQ in 5 min, without needing tedious

sample preparation;

Minimal interference and matrix effects in the analysis by using a MEW of 5

ppm;

Identification and confirmation of PQ and DQ can be carried out using molecular

ions of PQ and DQ, area ratios of M and (M+1) mass spectral peaks and

product ions of from AIF experiment

The method is sensitive and allowed the direct injection analysis of PQ and DQ

with MDLs (0.05 and 0.15

µ

g/L for PQ and DQ) meet the need of various

regulatory bodies.

References

1. J.E. Norman, K.M. Kuivila, L.H. Nowell, Scientific Investigations Report 2012–

5045, U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Geological Survey, 2012.

2. K.C. Wang, S.M. Chen, J.F. Hsu, S.G. Cheng, C.K. Lee. J. Chromatogr. B 876

(2008) 211.

3. J.C. Marr, J.B. King, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 11 (1997) 479.

4. X.P. Lee, T. Kumazawa, M. Fujishiro, C. Hasegawa, T. Arinobu, H. Seno, A. Ishii,

K. Sato, J. Mass Spectrom. 39 (2004) 1147.

Microsoft

®

Excel

®

are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. All other trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher

Scientific and its subsidiaries.

This information is not intended to encourage use of these products in any manners that might infringe the

intellectual property rights of others.

and DQ gave the highest area

ed molecular ion [M]

2+

and radical ion

The deprotonated cation [M – H]

+

t pH 5 mobile phase and was used

.100

184.105

C12H11N2:C12H11N2 p(gss, s/p:40)Chrg 1R: 14000...

183.1 183.2 183.3 183.4 183.5 183.6 183.7 183.8 183.9 184.0 184.1

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

183.09167

184.09503

.100

184.105

950

C12H11N2:C12H11N2 p(gss, s/p:40)Chrg 1R: 14000...

183.1 183.2 183.3 183.4 183.5 183.6 183.7 183.8 183.9 184.0 184.1

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

183.09167

184.09503

.100

184.105

932

pqdq_lev6_ph50_6_130417111717

#

290

RT:

2.80

AV:

1

NL:

7.59E6

T:

FTMS + p ESI Fullms [70.00-300.00]

183.1 183.2 183.3 183.4 183.5 183.6 183.7 183.8 183.9 184.0 184.1

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

183.09157

184.09496

183.15744

184.04536

G. DQ, [M

2+

- H

+

]

+

& [M

2+

-

H

+

]

+

(M+1)

.78 min

+1)

I. Measured, RT: 2.78 min

H. DQ, [M

2+

- H

+

]

+

& [M

2+

-

H

+

]

+

(M+1)

ctral peaks of selected quasi

ponding (M+1) peaks.

d area ratios of the three

.

MS analysis

masses of the three molecular ion

ratios obtained from the XIC of

d DQ. In addition, a CID experiment

product ion information that can be

emonstrated in Figure 3 by using

3

– H]

+

) and

m/z

153.07280 ([(M –

593 ([(M – H) – C

2

H

2

]

+

) (Ref. 3) and

analysis (Ref. 4).

FIGURE 3. XICs obtained from product ions of PQ and DQ using AIF experiment

for confirmation.

FIGURE 4. Analytical Performance.

Using deprotonated [M - H]

+

ion of PQ

and DQ, we evaluated the linearity of the

UHPLC Orbitrap MS system with seven

levels of calibration standards in

concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 100

mg/L. The calibration curve is shown in

Figure 4 with good R

2

> 0.9990 for both

compounds.

Initial determination of MDL derived by

using the U.S. EPA protocol was 0.05

and 0.15 mg/L for PQ and DQ. This

direct injection method, when fully

validated, would be able to provide high

sensitivity analysis of PQ and DQ that

will meet different DQO requirements of

various jurisdictions.