Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  55 / 302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 55 / 302 Next Page
Page Background

5

Thermo Scienti c Poster Note

PN ASMS13_T597_JBeck_E 07/13S

Conclusion

It is demonstrated that high-re

be carried out using UHPLC O

This method provides the follo

A fast LC, isocratic sepa

sample preparation;

Minimal interference an

ppm;

Identification and confir

ions of PQ and DQ, are

product ions of from AIF

The method is sensitive

with MDLs (0.05 and 0.

regulatory bodies.

References

1. J.E. Norman, K.M. Kuivi

5045, U.S. Department

2. K.C. Wang, S.M. Chen,

(2008) 211.

3. J.C. Marr, J.B. King, Ra

4. X.P. Lee, T. Kumazawa,

K. Sato, J. Mass Spectr

Microsoft

®

Excel

®

are trademarks of Mi

Scientific and its subsidiaries.

This information is not intended to enc

intellectual property rights of others.

lysis of PQ and DQ using mobile

d 7.3) at declustering potential (DP)

500 volts. The purpose of this

that maximal signal-to-noise ratio

ved in this study. Peak intensities

not shown in the figure. It is evident

Q and DQ analysis. As a result, a

Q and DQ

quasi molecular ions of PQ and DQ,

H]

+

and the singly charged radical ion

1) mass spectral peaks. Identification

of the three quasi molecular ions, their

d from the AIF experiment.

2+

- H

+

]

+

(M+1) [M]

+

.

[M]

+

.

(M+1)

184.09503 184.09950 185.10289

186.11071 186.11515 187.11854

le 1 for PQ ([M

2+

- H

+

]

+

), A (simulated)

d) and C (measured); DQ ([M

2+

- H

+

]

+

]+), E (simulated) and F (measured);

+1)), shown as simulated (G or H)

from Figure 1 that Orbitrap MS

nd matched perfectly with those

2E, 2G and 2H). Diquat has much

ass spectral separation of < 25 ppm,

m to separate these interfering peaks

urate determination of PQ.

From Table 2, deprotonated cation [M – H]

+

of PQ and DQ gave the highest area

counts and a good RSD followed by doubly-charged molecular ion [M]

2+

and radical ion

[M]

+.

had the lowest area counts at all pH values. The deprotonated cation [M – H]

+

had the best SNR (and the highest area counts) at pH 5 mobile phase and was used

in the analysis.

tandard deviation (RSD, N = 8)

g mobile phases at three different pH

ntial (DP) of 2000 volts. The purpose

obile phase pH that can be used in

pqdq_lev6_ph50_6_130417111717

4/17/201311:17:17AM

C12H13N2:C12H13N2 p(gss, s/p:40)Chrg 1R: 14000...

185.090

185.095

185.100

185.105

185.110

185.115

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

185.10732

C12H11N2:C12H11N2 p(gss, s/p:40)Chrg 1R: 14000...

184.085

184.090

184.095

184.100

184.105

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

184.09503

184.08871

184.09801

C12H11N2:C12H11N2 p(gss, s/p:40)Chrg 1R: 14000...

183.1 183.2 183.3 183.4 183.5 183.6 183.7 183.8 183.9 184.0 184.1

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

183.09167

184.09503

C12H12N2:C12H12N2 p(gss, s/p:40)Chrg 1R: 14000...

185.090

185.095

185.100

185.105

185.110

185.115

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

185.10286

185.09653

185.10583

C12H12N2:C12H12N2 p(gss, s/p:40)Chrg 1R: 14000...

184.085

184.090

184.095

184.100

184.105

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

184.09950

C12H11N2:C12H11N2 p(gss, s/p:40)Chrg 1R: 14000...

183.1 183.2 183.3 183.4 183.5 183.6 183.7 183.8 183.9 184.0 184.1

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

183.09167

184.09503

pqdq_lev6_ph50_6_130417111717

#

287

RT:

2.77

AV:

1

NL:

1.20E5

T:

FTMS + p ESI Fullms [70.00-300.00]

185.090

185.095

185.100

185.105

185.110

185.115

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

185.10718

185.10278

185.09831

185.09186

pqdq_lev6_ph50_6_130417111717

#

288

RT:

2.78

AV:

1

NL:

1.03E6

T:

FTMS + p ESI Fullms [70.00-300.00]

184.085

184.090

184.095

184.100

184.105

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

184.09496

184.09932

184.08868

pqdq_lev6_ph50_6_130417111717

#

290

RT:

2.80

AV:

1

NL:

7.59E6

T:

FTMS + p ESI Fullms [70.00-300.00]

183.1 183.2 183.3 183.4 183.5 183.6 183.7 183.8 183.9 184.0 184.1

m/z

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative Abundance

183.09157

184.09496

183.15744

184.04536

A. PQ, [M

2+

- H

+

]

+

G. DQ, [M

2+

- H

+

]

+

& [M

2+

-

H

+

]

+

(M+1)

F. Measured, RT: 2.78 min

E. DQ, [M]

+

.

D. DQ, [M

2+

- H

+

]

+

(M+1)

C. Measured, RT 2.77 min

B. DQ, [M]

+

.

(M+1)

I. Measured, RT: 2.78 min

H. DQ, [M

2+

- H

+

]

+

& [M

2+

-

H

+

]

+

(M+1)

FIGURE 2. Simulated and measured mass spectral peaks of selected quasi

molecular ions of PQ and DQ and their corresponding (M+1) peaks.

TABLE 1. Average area counts, RSD (N = 8) and area ratios of the three

molecular ions and their respective (M+1) ions.

Confirmation of PQ and DQ in UHPLC-Orbitrap MS analysis

From Table 2 at pH 5, LC retention time, accurate masses of the three molecular ion

peaks (M) and their respective (M+1) peaks, area ratios obtained from the XIC of

(M+1) and M peaks can be used to identify PQ and DQ. In addition, a CID experiment

carried out via AIF can also be useful in producing product ion information that can be

used for the confirmation of PQ and DQ. This is demonstrated in Figure 3 by using

XICs obtained from

m/z

169.07574 ([(M – H) – CH

3

– H]

+

) and

m/z

153.07280 ([(M –

H) – CH

3

- HCN]

+

) for PQ (Ref 4); and

m/z

157.07593 ([(M – H) – C

2

H

2

]

+

) (Ref. 3) and

m/z

130.06504 ([(M – H) – C

2

H

2

– HCN]

+

) for DQ analysis (Ref. 4).

FIGURE 3. XICs obtained fro

for confirmation.

FIGURE 4. Analytical Perfor