

Table 5. Quantitative results for ethylacetate and LOD determination.
ETHYLACETATE
ISTD: Acetone d
6
, syringe 1 mL, Speed 2
SRM (
m/z
65
→
m/z
33)
RT (min.)
Syringe
Speed
Average Height
Background
Subtracted
10.5
OFF
26000
15.55
2
130873
104873
Ethylacetate
SRM (
m/z
89
→
m/z
61)
RT (min)
Syringe
Speed
Average Height
Background
Subtracted
Response/ISTD
Ratio
Concentration
(µg/m
3
)
1.2 - 2.0
9
32602596
22190201
3.4 - 4.2
7
27961558
17549163
5.5 - 6.3
5
22186498
11774103
112.3
317.8
7.5 - 8.3
3
15989249
5576854
53.2
127.1
9.4 - 10.2
1
13090732
2678337
25.5
63.6
OFF
10412395
0
0.0
0
Std. Dev. = 218065
(3 x Std. Dev.) =
654194
6.24
16.2
LOD
RT:
0.00 - 16.16
SM:
7B
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Time (min)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
RelativeAbundance
1589ug/m3
Av.Ht.=32602596
635.7ug/m3
Av.Ht.=27961558
317.8ug/m3
Av.Ht.=22186498
127.1ug/m3
Av.Ht.=15989249
63.6ug/m3
Av.Ht.=13090732
Background
Av.Ht.=10412395
NL:3.43E7
TIC F:+cAPCI
sid=5.00 SRMms2
89.000@cid8.00
[60.500-61.500] MS
acetethyle courb
Calibration Curve
ETHYLACETATE
y = 0.0062x
2
+ 2.1287x
R
2
= 0.9993
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Conc. ug/m
3
Ratio (
m/z
89
→
m/z
61)/ISTD
Figure 4: Calibration curve for ethylacetate.
Figure 3: Reconstructed ion trace for ethylacetate to produce the calibration
curve.