Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  255 / 302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 255 / 302 Next Page
Page Background

3

Thermo Scientific Poster Note

PN63560_E 06/12S

retardants (BFRs) and

Both BFRs and OCs

s. Therefore, detection

is developed to

ectrometry (LC-MS).

o reduce sample

e quadrupole (TSQ)

e linear ion trap were

ves for the TSQ method

ther study.

in various industries

cted in the biosphere.

s, the most infamous of

ited States, their use

and OCs, as well as

ctivity therein, makes

topic. We propose

need for

ting sample

s.

/mL to make stock

ing standards:

ppb. Kepone was

iked and un-spiked

ation.

ear ion trap mass

ode, with a grid voltage

were acquired for all

ionization, and obtain

ce was run in direct

MAX triple stage

n the TSQ Quantum

1D transmission mode,

ired on the LTQ™

rature 270 ºC, tube lens

ted reaction monitoring

ith the following

RM data was acquired

re of 1.5, with

he full scan sensitivity

s with an average

ART-SVP in 1D

re detected and

MS/MS spectra were

Figure 2). Confirmation

e DART-SVP in direct

FIGURE 1. Caption is Arial 13 pt Bold. The caption is always positioned above

the figure. Figures no longer have a visible box around them. Always leave at

least one line of space between the last line of the caption and the figure.

Always leave space between the figure caption and the vertical rule to the right.

Do not change the width of the caption box unless you are putting figures side

by side.

Figures spanning multiple columns are forbidden. Each column is

over a foot wide when printed full size. If a figure has so much detail that it

needs to be more than two feet wide to be readable, no one is going to have the

time to read all that detail anyway.

FIGURE 5. Caption.

Compound

Molecular Structure

Formula

Theoretical

monoisotopic (most

intense isotope)

m/z

Observed precursor

for MS/MS and

proposed ionization

mechanism

Fragments

(monitored

SRM

transitions)

allyl 2,4,6-tribromophenyl

ether*

C

9

H

7

Br

3

O 367.8 (369.8)

306.9

[M+OH-HBr]

-

C

9

H

7

Br

2

O

2

265.8

1,2,5,6-tetrabromo

cyclooctane*

C

8

H

12

Br

4

423.8 (427.8)

459.6

[M+O

2

]

-

C

8

H

12

Br

4

O

2

Weak

fragmentation

2,3,4,5,6-

pentabromoethylbenzene

C

8

H

5

Br

5

495.6 (499.63)

436.7

[M+OH-HBr]

-

C

8

H

5

Br

4

O

81.0, 274.7,

356.6

2-bromo-1,3-

bis(dibromomethyl)benzene

C

8

H

5

Br

5

495.6 (499.6)

370.8

[M+O+OH-2HBr]

-

C

8

H

4

Br

3

O

2

79.0, 81.0,

326.7

hexabromobenzene

C

6

Br

6

545.51 (551.5)

486.5

[M+OH-HBr]

-

C

6

Br

5

O

378.0, 380.0

tetrabromobisphenol A

C

15

H

12

Br

4

O

2

539.8 (543.8)

542.8

[M-H]

-

C

15

H

11

Br

4

O

2

290.8, 417.8,

419.8

tris(2,3-

dibromopropyl)isocyanurate

C

12

H

15

Br

6

N

3

O

3

722.6 (728.6)

727.5

[M-H]

-

C

12

H

14

B

r6

N

3

O

3

79.0, 81.0

tetrabromophthalic

anhydride*

C

8

Br

4

O

3

459.7 (463.7)

398.7

[M+OH-HBr]

-

C

8

Br

3

O

4

326.8, 354.8

1,2,5,6,9,10-

hexabromocyclododecane

C

12

H

18

Br

6

635.7 (641.6)

640.62

[M-H]

-

C

12

H

17

Br

6

79.0, 81.0

kepone

C

10

Cl

10

O 485.7 (489.7)

506.8

[M+OH]

-

C

10

Cl

10

O

2

H

424.8, 426.8

TABLE 1. Compounds analyzed with structures, formulas, proposed ionization

mechanisms, observed precursors, and monitored SRM transitions. All precursor

masses detected by the linear ion trap were confirmed on the triple stage

quadrupole with DART-SVP infusion. Compounds marked with an asterisk were

not detected initially but were seen with DART-SVP infusion.

Direct infusion was achieved by connecting an electrospray needle via peek tubing to a

syringe pump. The needle was held by forceps in a multi-positional clamp. The needle

was then positioned directly between the DART-SVP source and the ceramic capillary

interfaced with the mass spectrometer. Compounds were infused at rates ranging from

1 to 5 µL/min and a concentration of 100 ppm. The infusion studies showed that the

compounds required higher DART-SVP source temperatures for optimum ionization

than were initially utilized. The optimum temperature was determined to be 400 ºC. The

results of the infusion studies shown in Figure 1 confirm the linear ion trap MS data. It

also shows it was possible to ionize the three compounds that were not initially

observed on the linear ion trap MS due to the DART-SVP source temperature being too

low.

It is interesting to note that the results shown in Figure 1 demonstrate a pattern in the

ionization pathway of the molecules. Compounds containing a hydrogen bonded to a

non-aromatic carbon, such as tetrabromobisphenol A, tended to lose a proton to form

the [M-H]

-

species. Alternatively, compounds containing no hydrogen atoms or

hydrogen bonded to an aromatic carbon tended to add OH

-

and lose HBr.

In addition to optimizing precursor detection the DART-SVP infusion method was used

to determine

:

tube lens values, fragment ions and CE breakdown curves for the

quantitative experiments on the TSQ MS. In the process of acquiring the CE

breakdown curves it was noted that the fragments differed from those observed in the

linear ion trap, as shown in Figure 2. This is not surprising as the fragmentation in the

TSQ MS is more energetic than that in the linear ion trap MS.

allyl 2,4,6-tribromophenyl ether

300

305

310

315

m/z

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

RelativeAbundance

306.61

304.93 308.71

301.01

310.11 312.84 317.04

306.88

304.89

308.88

309.95 313.00

NL:

1.50E5

2-4-6--tribromophenyl-allyl-

ether#30-54 RT: 0.26-0.46

AV: 25T: -pNSIQ1MS

[217.070-517.000]

NL:

1.06E4

C

9

H

7

Br

2

O

2

:

C

9

H

7

Br

2

O

2

p(gss, s/p:40)Chrg-1

R:

500Res.Pwr.@FWHM

1,2,5,6-t

454

456

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

RelativeAbundance

45

455.59

4

455.76

2-bromo-1,3-bis(dibromomethyl)benzen

e

366 368 370 372 374 376 378

m/z

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

RelativeAbundance

370.61 372.71

368.79

374.67

375.58

365.36

379.29

370.78 372.77

368.78

374.77

375.85 377.88

NL:

7.51E5

2-Br-1-3-bis-dibromomethyl-

benzene#225-292 RT:

3.84-4.99 AV: 68T: -pNSI

Q1MS [299.070-699.000]

NL:

8.16E3

C

8

H

4

Br

3

O

2

:

C

8

H

4

Br

3

O

2

p(gss, s/p:40)Chrg-1

R:

600Res.Pwr.@FWHM

hexabro

480

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

RelativeAbundance

482.5

480.62

482.5

FIGURE 1. TSQ full scan infusion

spectra for observed precursors d

mechanisms. Top spectrum in eac

theoretically generated spectrum

Panel B of Figure 2 depicts a spectru

the auto-tune procedure in which the

the most intense fragments are auto

Quantitative experiments

After the infusion experiments, the 1

was installed. Kepone was selected

ionization, and spiked into all sample

free run mode with a constant rail sp

generate the best approximation of G

spiking that can occur when the rail

The results of calibrators and sample

signal from a single spot. Each chro

one pass through the 10-spot rail. 5

horizontal line through the center of t

total application of 10 µL. Several of t

specifically tetrabromobisphenol A, 1,

tris(2,3-dibromopropyl)isocyanurate.

poor. It was determined that each co

possible to normalize responses with

reproducibility was most likely a funct

have been compensated for by the u

given the variation in response from

quantitative information. Peak areas f

FIGURE 2. MS/MS Spectra for tetra

trap data, Panel B depicts triple qu

a normalized collision energy of 3

stepped collision energy in the aut

A

B

542_8

_BFRs_225C_008 # 13-14 RT: 0

.11-0.11

AV:

2

NL:

5.27E

T:

I MS

-pNSIFullms2542.80@cid

35.00 [145.00-550.00]

150

200

250

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

RelativeAbundance