Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  339 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 339 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

Forensic Toxicology Screening with LC-MS/MS

and Automated Online Sample Preparation

Guifeng Jiang, Marta Kozak, Subodh Nimkar, Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA

Forensic Toxicology Use Only.

Application

Note: 507b

Key Words

• ToxSpec Analyzer

• ToxID Software

• LXQ Linear Ion

Trap

• TurboFlow

Technology

• Forensic

Toxicology

Introduction

The quality of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

(LC-MS) data collected in forensic drug screening applica-

tions is largely affected by sample preparation methods.

Offline solid phase extraction (SPE) and liquid-liquid extrac-

tion (LLE) are the most commonly used methods. Auto-

mated online sample preparation using Thermo Scientific

TurboFlow technology provides a robust front end platform

for forensic drug screening, which is convenient and labor-

saving.

Goal

The goal is to evaluate the performance of three sample

preparation techniques – TurboFlow™ technology, SPE, and

LLE – to screen 300 basic, neutral, and acidic drug com-

pounds for forensic toxicology use.

Experimental

SPE –

Mixed-mode Thermo Scientific HyperSep Verify-CX

SPE cartridges (200 mg; 6 mL) were used for offline SPE.

Samples of 1 mL of urine were spiked to final concentra-

tions of 10, 100 and 1000 ng/mL with analytes of interest,

as well as 100 ng/mL of three deuterated internal standards,

and loaded on the SPE column. Basic, acidic, and neutral

fractions were collected, combined, evaporated to dryness,

reconstituted in 100 µL, and injected onto the LC column.

LLE –

Toxi-Tubes

®

A & B (Varian) were used for offline LLE.

Samples of 1 mL of urine were spiked to final concentra-

tions of 10, 100 and 1000 ng/mL with analytes of interest,

as well as 100 ng/mL of three deuterated internal standards,

and then applied to the Toxi-Tube. The organic layers were

transferred, evaporated to dryness, reconstituted in 100 µL,

and injected onto the LC-MS.

TurboFlow Method –

Urine samples were diluted in ratio

1:1 v/v with 50% MeOH containing internal standards.

Fifty (50) µL of diluted sample was injected onto the Turbo-

Flow columns. Two different chemistry TurboFlow columns

were used to extract chemically diverse compounds.

A 12-minute LC method was developed for TurboFlow

and LLE samples. Samples were injected onto a Thermo

Scientific Hypersil GOLD PFP 100 x 30 mm, 3 µm column.

A gradient method was employed with flow rates

of 600 µL/min. For offline SPE samples, a 13-minute LC

gradient was used with a Thermo Scientific Hypersil GOLD

PFP analytical column (50 x 2.1 mm, 5 µm) and a

200 µL/min flow rate.

Mass Spectrometry

All samples were analyzed on the Thermo Scientific ToxSpec

Analyzer system equipped with a Thermo Scientific LXQ

linear ion trap mass spectrometer and an electrospray ion-

ization (ESI) source using a scan-dependent, polarity-switch-

ing method. Reports were automatically produced with

Thermo Scientific ToxID automated forensic toxicology

screening software, including lists of identified compounds

and their matching MS/MS spectrum.

Results and Discussion

Table 1 shows limits of identification for representative

compounds from the SPE, LLE, and TurboFlow methods.

The lowest concentration validated was 10 ng/mL. All three

methods showed comparable limits of identification. In ad-

dition, with the automated TurboFlow method, the sample

quantity loaded on the column was one-quarter of that in

the SPE method and one-eighth of that in the LLE method.

Table 1. Comparison of limits of identification for selected compounds

TurboFlow Method

SPE Method

LLE Method

Compound

(ng/mL in urine)

(ng/mL in urine)

(ng/mL in urine)

Codeine

10

10

10

Hydrocodone

10

10

10

Cocaine

10

10

10

Amphetamine

10

10

1000

Stanozolol

100

100

10

Diazepam

10

10

10

Figure 1 shows the results of the identification limits

of 300 drugs with the three sample preparation meth-

ods. Compared to

traditional sample

preparation meth-

ods, the automated

TurboFlow method

provides competent

performance with

automated online

sample preparation.

Figure 1: Limits of identification of 300 compounds

Conclusion

The TurboFlow method with the ToxSpec™ Analyzer al-

lows for the identification of 300 drugs, with limits of detec-

tion (LODs) ranging from less than 10 ng to greater than

1000 ng per milliliter of urine. It provides an automated

online sample preparation platform for forensic toxicol-

ogy screening with competent performance and limits of

identifications. The TurboFlow method is easier, faster, and

cost efficient in comparison to traditionally used SPE and

LLE methods.

DOWNLOAD