Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  192 / 302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 192 / 302 Next Page
Page Background

8

A Strategy for an Unknown Screening Approach on Environmental Samples using HRAM Mass Spectrometry

comparison.

B

ations of a suspect screen

ow was run. For this the

sferred to the screening

itioned component

settings and parameters

inder to SIEVE

detection process could be

lt, 5000 components were

ntains all components

e, refinement of this list was

process, all samples were

ter sample, so a simple filter

atrix and background

ving 1829 components in

pal component analysis to

water samples were closely

e (surface water 1, see Fig.

nt in its content, so the filter

uld be further refined.

filtering for significant

surfacewater1

tapwater

high resolving power of R = 70,000 @

m/z

200 used in this

analysis.

FIGURE 7. Importance of sufficient resolution for

unambiguous identification of components: The

monoisotopic signl (A) and the first isotope signal (B)

are surrounded by matrix signals of similar intensity

which are only separated by means of the high

resolving power used.

Since all final processing was done in one application, the

results of target, suspect and unknown screening could

easily be combined into one result, making result reporting

and archiving one single step. Since all data transfer

between the two applications is fully automated, Fig. 8

shows a short selection of compounds which had not been

part of the initial target screening, but were found in the

unknown screening process.

FIGURE 8. Selection of additional contaminants not

present in previous target and suspect screen.

Compound Name Formula

m/z (Apex) m/z (Delta (ppm)) RT (Measured) Isotopic Pattern Score (%)

Bisoprolol

C18H31NO4

326.2330

0.57

5.12

100

Candesartan C24H20N6O3 441.1671

-0.50

6.56

100

Carbofuran

C12H15NO3

222.1127

-0.19

5.18

98

Dibenzylamine C14H15N

198.1277

-0.66

7.31

98

Irbesartan

C25H28N6O 429.2401

-0.03

6.45

100

Loxoprofen

C15H18O3

247.1332

0.45

5.52

85

Mexacarbate C12H18N2O2 223.1443

-0.06

5.53

96

Oxazepam C15H11ClN2O2 287.0584

0.48

6.29

96

Propiconazole C15H17Cl2N3O2 342.0774

0.21

7.43

89

Tramadol

C16H25NO2

264.1961

0.10

4.35

100

Conclusion

In this example of environmental analysis we could show

that it is possible to enhance the capabilities of target and

suspect screening with its limitations by a streamlined

general unknown screening with a high degree of

automation from within one application. The resolving

power of the Exactive Plus bench top Orbitrap MS system

is the driving force behind the selectivity and reliability of

the obtained results because this serves for the separation

of the analyte peaks from background and matrix signals.

Chemspider is a trademark of the Royal Society of Chemistry. All other trademarks are the property of

Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries. This information is not intended to encourage use of

these products in any manners that might infringe the intellectual property rights of others.

Presented at RAFA, Prague, Czech Republic, Nov 5-8, 2013.