Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  595 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 595 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

3

Thermo Scientific Poster Note

PN64039 HUPO14_E 04/14S

proteins for the first set of experiments was serotransferrin and

zinc-

α

-2-glycoprotein.

A second set of samples were prepared following the same

approach targeting four different proteins: serotransferrin, zinc-

α

-2-glycoprotein,

α

-1-antitrypsin, and lactotransferrin. Four

different MSIA D.A.R.T. tips were used with each set covalently

bound to the specific Ab. The same set of samples were used

for individual extraction (one tip per sample) followed by

reduction, alkylation, and digestion then LC-MS. The second set

of samples had each vial processed through serial extraction by

different MSIA tip. For example, one sample was first extracted

by anti-serotransferrin, then anti-lactotransferrin etc. and the

extractions were pooled prior to reduction, alkylation, and

digested and ultimately LC-MS.

FIGURE 3. Comparative

result of extraction step

peptide vs. An N-linked

consistent across each

extracted. The two pep

Sample extraction and elution (2 hour)

#1

#3 #4 #5 #6

#2

Same analytical

sample for all

extractions

Acquisition

Queue

#1

#2

#3

#4

….

LC-MS

Single

Pooled

LC-MS

Reduction

Alkylation

Digestion

Reduction

Alkylation

Digestion

FIGURE 1. Strategy for testing the effects of serial dilution

on sample disruption. Two sample preparation types were

individual extraction and analysis vs. pooling samples.

HSTIFENLANK

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0

5

10

Peptide AUC Ratios [Sample 2: Sample x]

Serotransferr

FIGURE 4. Comparative

serotransferrin peptides

from the second MSIA e

extractions.

ucibility of serial protein extraction

ual or multiple protein extraction.

S analysis of MSIA D.A.R.T serial

ple using one Ab for a single

er D.A.R.T tip).

1

The relative

used to determine depletion and

ilution.

ractions increased targeted peptide

gnificantly increasing background

bundance resulting from pooling

protein sequence coverage and

lycopeptides and corresponding

using LC-MS provides significant

otein sequence variations,

extend the sensitivity,

ed on antibody (Ab) capture has

fits of Ab capture for LC-MS

protein amounts while

und matrix effects facilitating faster

uence coverage. Performing Ab

metry ImmunoAffinity (MSIA)

ample. This facilitates serial

mes yet facilitating multiplexed

Results

Liquid Chromatography (or more generically Separations)

LC separation was performed using a Thermo Fisher Scientific™

Hypersil Gold™ 100 x 1 mm column with 1.9 µm particle size and

a binary solvent system comprised of A) 0.1% formic acid and B)

0.1% formic acid in MeCN. A linear gradient of 5-32% B was

performed over 15 minutes prior to column washing and re-

equilibration.

Mass Spectrometry

All experiments were performed on a Thermo Scientific™ Q

Exactive™ mass spectrometer operated in data

dependent/dynamic exclusion mode using a Top 10 acquisition

scheme. Full scan MS spectra were acquired using a resolution

setting of 70k and all HCD product ion spectra were acquired

using 15k.

Data Analysis

Initial unbiased data searching was performed using Thermo

Scientific™ Proteome Discoverer™ 1.4 to Thermo Scientific™

Pinpoint 1.4 to search N- and O-linked glycopeptides through the

Screening Tool. To total list of peptides (modified and

unmodified) were used to performed relative quantitation across

all samples. Qualitative assessment was based on retention time

overlap with spectral library values, accurate mass (10 ppm

tolerance), and isotopic distribution. Negative controls were

analyzed by evaluating precursor ion intensities for sample RAW

files not expected to contain the targeted protein.

ltiplexed Protein Quantitation Using Serial Immunoaffinity Ex

C-MS

n,

1

Amol Prakash,

1

Gregory Byram,

1

Maryann Vogelsang,

1

Gouri Vadali,

1

Bryan Krastin

1

Thermo Fisher Scientific BRIMS, Cambridge, MA

FIGURE 6. Comparative t

different sample preparati

histograms report the nor

MSIA extraction per plas

serial MSIA extraction of t

“Serial”). The numbers b

represents the degree of

MS analysis. For exampl

where the alpha-1-antitry

other targeted protein ext

0.0

2

dHex1Hex5HexNAc5NeuAc1

dHex1Hex4HexNAc4NeuAc

dHex1Hex6HexNAc2

Hex6HexNAc5NeuAc3

Hex6HexNAc5NeuAc2

Hex6HexNAc5NeuAc1

Hex5HexNAc4NeuAc2

Hex5HexNAc4NeuAc1

Hex4HexNAc3NeuAc1

Hex6HexNAc6

Hex4HexNAc4

peptide

N-linked Glycan

FIGURE 5. Reproducibilit

comparative AUC ratios f

C*GLVPLAENYN*K.S as