Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  466 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 466 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

4

Quantitative Analysis of THC and Main Metabolites in Whole Blood Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Automated Online Sample Preparation

nal, France

Results

Method Development

Different TurboFlow columns (Cyclone, Cyclone P, Fluoro, Phenyl-Hexyl) were

evaluated with different loading conditions. Also different separation columns were

evaluated (Accucore C18, Hypersil Gold C18, Accucore PFP and Accucore aQ) with

different gradients. And finally, transfer optimization was also studied. The final

chromatogram is shown in Figure 5.

Recovery and matrix effects

Precipitation Recovery

was obtained by comparing an injection of whole blood spiked

with the analytes and then crashed, against whole blood crashed first and then spiked.

On-line extraction Recovery

was evaluated by comparing a direct injection of a

standard solution to the analytical column against an injection to the TurboFlow column.

Matrix Effects

were evaluated by comparing an injection of standard solution to the

TurboFlow column against an injection of blood spiked at the same concentration.

Overall recovery

was obtained considering both recovery and matrix effects. Results

are presented on figure 6.

Calibration curves

Calibration curves were generated with LCQuan 2.7 SP1 software by injecting whole

blood samples spiked with THC, 11-OH-THC and THC-COOH. And crashed before

injection Their deuterated (D3) compounds were used as internal standards. With a

concentration of 17ng/mL The calibration model was linear with an equal weighting. In

these conditions, curves were linear through the calibration range, from 0.5ng/mL to

100ng/mL. The calibration curves are presented in figure 7.

d in Focus mode (figure 2) with a Thermo

Analytical separation was carried out on a

(50×2.1 mm, 2.6-

μm particle size) . The

A : 0.1% formic acid in water; loading C: 0.1%

xture of isopropanol, acetonitrile, and acetone

nium formate + 0.1% formic acid in water;

The total LC runtime was 10.4 min (Figure 3).

le stage quadrupole mass spectrometer was

onization (HESI-II) source in positive

HC and in negative ionization mode for

e selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode

diagram of TurboFlow Technology.

d conditions.

ions

LC gradient conditions

(Eluting Pump)

and SRM transitions.

C:\Users\...\121005-gammefinale\P2-01

10/4/201210:59:29PM

0.5ppb

RT:

4.00 -7.00

4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0

Time (min)

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

0

50

100

RT:5.72

RT:5.71

RT:5.38

RT:5.38

RT:5.42

RT:5.42

NL:1.33E6

TIC F:+pESISRMms2315.179

[193.165-193.175] MS Genesis

P2-01

NL:1.10E7

TIC F:+pESISRMms2318.240

[196.195-196.205] MS Genesis

P2-01

NL:7.39E5

m/z=192.62-193.62F:+pESISRM

ms2331.156 [193.115-193.125,

201.125-201.135] MSP2-01

NL:2.67E7

TIC F:+pESISRMms2334.210

[316.305-316.315] MS Genesis

P2-01

NL:3.38E4

TIC F: -pESISRMms2343.097

[245.225-245.235] MS Genesis

P2-01

NL:1.84E6

TIC F: -pESISRMms2346.200

[302.155-302.165] MS Genesis

P2-01

THC

THC-D3

11-OH-THC-D3

11-OH-THC

THC-COOH

THC-COOH-D3

FIGURE 5. SRM chromatograms of THC, 11-OH-THC and THC-COOH as well as

deuterated standards (D3) from a blood sample spiked at 0.5 ng/mL.

FIGURE 6. Method recovery and matrix effects.

The concentration was 7.5 ng/mL in standard , crashed whole blood and whole blood samples.

Injection volume was set to 20µL in all cases and 5 injections were performed in each

condition.

FIGURE 7. Calibration c

and crashed whole bloo

TH

Y =

Area ratio

1

Y

R

Area ratio

T

Y

R

Area ratio

Each calibration point wa

accuracy (%Diff) and the

in figure 8.

FIGURE 8. Accuracy (%

calibrator (n=10)