Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  108 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 108 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

6

Targeted Quantitation of Insulin and Its Therapeutic Analogs for Research

Conclusions

Automated sample extraction is amenable to high-throughput analysis,

thus decreasing sample preparation times.

Insulin MSIA D.A.R.T.’S equivalently extract multiple insulin variants

present at different concentrations for simultaneous detection and

quantification for research.

HRAM MS affords qualitative confirmation and quantification of the insulin

variants present in one LC/MS run.

Pinpoint software version 1.3 provides automated data extraction,

confirmation, and quantification for all insulin analogs.

Reduced complexity affords shorter LC gradients, and, therefore, shorter

LC/MS analysis times.

An LLOD < 15 pM and an LLOQ of 15 pM (87 pg/mL) in 0.5 mL of plasma

were achieved.

Intra- and inter-day repeatabilities were < 3%, thus making the insulin

MSIA workflow highly reproducible.

References

1. Thevis, M, Thomas, A., Schänzer, W. Mass Spectom. Reviews

2008

,

27(1)

, 35-50.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Stephan Morely from the Sheffield Hospital,

UK for the donation of the insulin variants used in the study.

For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.

Humulin is a registered trademark of Eli Lilly. Lantus and Apidra are trademarks of Sanofi-Aventis. All other

trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries.

This information is not intended to encourage use of these products in any manners that might infringe the

intellectual property rights of others.

PO64078-EN 0614S

%CV

Accuracy

.04%

40.80%

.46%

11.87%

.85%

-3.46%

.75%

-2.66%

.69%

-3.39%

.20%

-3.06%

.04%

-1.41%

.67%

0.34%

ev

Plus 4

StDev

05

4.57E+05

TABLE 5. Spike and recovery

Sample

Spike Conc.

(pM)

Exp. Conc.

(pM)

Average

(pM)

Exp Recovery

Conc. (pM)

% Yield

Neat_1

0.00

43.79

44.59

Neat_2

45.59

Neat_3

44.38

Low_1

19.50

65.08

64.11

19.52

100.12%

Low_2

63.65

Low_3

63.61

Medium_1

199.50

241.19

237.56

192.97

96.73%

Medium_2

239.80

Medium_3

231.70

High_1

919.50

960.91

928.63

884.05

96.14%

High_2

905.35

High_3

919.64

%CV

Accuracy

3

2.43%

%CV

Accuracy

2

2.15%

h Workflow

M (highlighted in red in

tion where we could achieve a

achieved for the insulin MSIA

entration where the mean total

ckground signal added to the