Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  69 / 302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 69 / 302 Next Page
Page Background

5

by reducing the number of transitions being acquired

simultaneously and the time between when target peaks

elute and when their acquisition window begins or ends.

Figure 6 shows a real-world example of a pesticide

analysis of over 300 compounds using Timed-SRM. As

shown in the Table 1 comparison with Segmented-SRM,

Timed-SRM increases both the sensitivity of the analysis

Figure 6. Real-world acquisition of over 300 pesticides in a single chromatographic run using Timed-SRM.

Segmented-SRM

Timed-SRM

Average number of simultaneous transtions during run

55 Transitions

15 Transitions

Shortest time interval between a compound retnetion time and

an acquisiton window break

5 Seconds

15 Seconds

Table 1. Comparison of Segmented-SRM vs. Timed-SRM for method of over 300 pesticides. Timed-SRM can dramatically reduce the

average number of transitions occurring simultaneously, while increasing the minimum time between an eluting peak and an acquisition

window break.