Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  68 / 302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 68 / 302 Next Page
Page Background

4

This then forces a compromise between adding many

compounds per segment, reducing individual SRM

dwell times and sensitivity, and adding segment breaks

between closely eluting peaks, which causes the risk of

false negatives due to shifts in peak retention times outside

of acquisition windows because, for example, a large bit

of matrix coelutes with a peak.

The TSQ 8000 system takes an approach called Timed-

SRM that eliminates this compromise. Timed-SRM

removes the limitations of segmented SRM by centering

acquisition windows on the retention time of each peak

and allowing for acquisition window overlap, so that

acquisition windows for all nearby eluting compounds are

not forced to start and stop at the same time (Figure 5).

The user simply needs to enter the retention time of each

compound, and the instrument method takes care of the

rest, eliminating the need for creating segments.

High Compound Capacity Methods

One of the primary challenges of modern pesticide

analysis is the sheer number of pesticides that need

monitoring in order to meet international standards. This

is particularly true in food analysis where products are

transported across country borders, requiring exporters

to meet the regulatory demands of many countries. Triple

quadrupole instruments help meet this demand due to

the high selectivity of MRM analysis, which allows for

spectral separation of coeluting peaks due to unique

reactions in the collision cell. This enables monitoring of

more compounds in a single chromatographic run without

prohibitive interference. However, due to the targeted

nature of the MRM process, individual scan events must

be created for each pesticide to be monitored, placing a

strain on the amount of time devoted to the monitoring

of each compound, and thus the sensitivity of the analysis

of each compound.

With a traditional style analysis, this issue can be partially

resolved by slicing up the acquisition list into discreet time

segments, so that all transitions are not being monitored

at the same time. However, this can quickly lead to

problems when analyzing more than 50 pesticides in one

run. This is because, due to the density of the peaks in the

heart of the method, it is difficult to find a time for a

segment break when no target peaks are eluting.

Acquisition windows

centered around

retention time

Acquisition windows

allowed to overlap

Figure 5. The TSQ 8000 system Timed-SRM Acquisition list, showing SRM acquisition windows centered on retention times and overlapping nearby transitions.