Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  227 / 302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 227 / 302 Next Page
Page Background

9

Although not enough data is available to explain the

non-occurrence of PAHs in runoff from the campus

parking lots, the residential parking lot had a much

slower drainage capability, and thus, the sample was

collected under moderate flooding conditions. The lower

drainage rate may have enhanced the possibility of

detections as PAH-containing suspended particles could

not be washed out by the rain as fast as in the campus

parking lots. It is also possible that the nature of the

coatings is different, as it has been shown that asphalt-

based coatings contain many fewer PAHs than coal-based

coatings.

25

Samples of reclaimed water used for irrigation at FIU

Biscayne Bay campus were collected in two different dates

and analyzed in order to assess the performance of the

developed methodology to detect PAHs discharged with

WWTP effluents. Alkylnaphthalenes were detected in one

on the samples (Table 4), but concentrations were lower

than the reporting limit. Good recoveries were obtained in

the fortified matrix experiment for reclaimed water,

suggesting that method sensitivity rather than a severe

matrix effect prevented positive quantification in these

samples. Excellent recoveries were also obtained in

fortified matrix experiments with the other two types of

environmental waters tested with this method, which may

suggest that the use of a wide range of molecular sizes of

isotopically labeled PAHs normalizes analyte behavior

during the automated preconcentration and analysis,

keeping matrix effects under control in spite of the lack of

any other sample preparation steps such as filtration. In

addition, method reproducibility was also good upon

analysis of duplicates of PAH-containing seawater and

runoff samples.

Figure 3. Chromatograms obtained upon analysis of a rainwater runoff sample from a residential parking lot and its comparison with

reference rainwater. (Blue trace: main (quantitative) SRM transition in runoff sample; green trace: secondary (confirmation) SRM

transition in runoff sample; red trace: main SRM transition from injection of reference rainwater)