Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  223 / 302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 223 / 302 Next Page
Page Background

5

Data Analysis

Data analysis was performed using Thermo Scientific

TraceFinder

EFS software version 3.0.

Results and Discussion

Optimization of Dopant-Assisted APPI Detection

Pure chlorobenzene provides efficient charge transfer

ionization for all PAH in the presence of water, methanol,

and acetonitrile.

19

Therefore, commercially available

high-purity chlorobenzene was used as dopant in this

study without any treatment. Under these conditions, a

strong positive molecular ion (M

) for each analyte was

always observed and isolated as the precursor ion for the

SRM scan events, which is consistent with observations

by other authors who have used chlorobenzene as dopant

for APPI-LC-MS analysis of PAHs.

20

Two programmable syringe pumps and a spraying device

placed in the auxiliary nitrogen gas stream were used.

With this system, little or no backpressure was applied to

the syringe pumps, which translated into stable dopant

delivery. Since analytical signals maximized at a dopant

flow rate of approximately 10% of the eluent flow rate,

using a programmable dopant system has the advantage

of maintaining this optimum ratio as the eluent flow rate

changes during the chromatographic separation.

The spraying system was tested with two syringe pumps

equipped with four 10 mL syringes (40 mL total), which

provided 26 runs (approximately 12 h of continuous

operation) before syringe refills were required. This

translates into a consumption of about 1.5 mL of

chlorobenzene per sample. In comparison, the traditional

LLE-GC-MS approach may require up to 150 mL

(3 × 50 mL extractions) with organic solvents, such as

methylene chloride, to ensure a high recovery.

Chlorobenzene has a much shorter atmospheric persistence

(half-life of 20–40 h) than methylene chloride and is not

considered a carcinogen. Thus, both the lower quantity and

the nature of the halogenated waste produced suggest that

the online SPE-LC-APPI-MS/MS is a more environmentally

friendly methodology than LLE-GC-MS.

Optimization of Chromatographic Separation

During compound optimization for SRM detection, it was

observed that PAHs with the same parent masses have

similar behavior upon collision-induced dissociation (same

product ions, same collision energy, see Table 1), eliminating

the possibility of selective detection of isobaric PAHs.

Because comprehensive PAH analysis requires quantitation

beyond the 16 priority PAHs, a carefully controlled LC

separation is required to solve most of these isobaric

interferences. In addition, since PAH molecules have fixed

planar conformations, chromatographic selectivity is

governed solely by their molecular dimensions.

21

Furthermore, complete chromatographic resolution of the

16 PAHs listed as priority by the EPA using the Hypersil

Green PAH stationary phase has been previously

reported.

22,23

This stationary phase was selected to explore

the possibility of a liquid chromatography separation of

most alkylated PAHs as these compounds are often used

as markers to identify pollution sources and

environmental transformations.

4, 24

Light PAHs

(i.e., alkylnaphthalenes) could be only efficiently separated

using a methanol/water gradient system, as the use of

acetonitrile/water caused fast elution with no resolution

control. On the other hand, methanol proved to be a

weak solvent for PAHs

m/z

228 and above, causing

excessively high retention times and peak shape

broadening even at 100% methanol isocratic elution. A

second gradient between methanol and acetonitrile was

then used after the water/methanol system. Still, retention

times for PAHs

m/z

252 and above were also very high

even at 100% acetonitrile conditions. To perform an

efficient, wide mass range separation, a flow rate gradient

was also used in combination with solvent strength

control, taking advantage of the steep backpressure drop

observed as water is removed from the analytical column

during the gradient.

Figure 2 compares the obtained resolution of alkylated

PAHs contained in the Standard Reference Material 1491a

to that obtained by traditional GC-MS analysis. Although

resolution for C1-naphthalenes was lower than GC, two

marginally resolved peaks are observed in the SPE-LC-MS/MS

separation of these compounds that differ only in the

position of a single methyl group between adjacent carbon

atoms. Since C1-naphthalenes are detected as a group, the

limited resolution does not affect quantitation. As analyte

mass increased, the observed resolution behavior tended to

be similar to that obtained by GC-MS. Both techniques

had the same difficulty in separating C1-fluoranthenes and

C1-pyrenes (four peaks should be observed in the

m/z

216

chromatogram), while complete resolution was observed

for 3-methylchrysene and 6-methylchrysene in both

methods. All four methylphenanthrenes are visible and

well separated from the 2-methylanthracene signal, in

contrast to the GC-MS separation where a coelution of the

two groups is observed. These results indicate that

isobaric-alkylated PAHs can be partially resolved using

single-column liquid chromatography.

Figure 2. Comparison of peaks of PAHs contained in the Standard Reference Material

1491a, obtained by GC-MS analysis (1/10 dilution in hexane, top) and by SPE-LC-MS/

MS analysis (1/27,500 serial dilution in seawater, bottom ). Reference material listed

compounds: C1-naphthalenes (1-methyl, 2-methyl); C2-naphthalenes (1,2-dimethyl,

1,6-dimethyl, 2,6-dimethyl); C1-phenanthrenes (1-methyl, 2-methyl, 3-methyl, 9-methyl);

C1-anthracenes (2-methyl); C1-fluoranthenes (1-methyl, 3-methyl); C1-pyrenes (1-methyl,

4-methyl); C1-chrysenes (3-methyl, 6 methyl). Standard Reference Material 1491a also

contains one C2- phenanthrene (1,7-dimethyl, not shown)