Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  150 / 302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 150 / 302 Next Page
Page Background

2

There are a series of regulations issued by the European Union (EU) related to marine biotoxins.

Regulation (EC) No 853/2004

1

concerns the control of lipophilic toxins, establishing maximum

levels for lipophilic toxins in bivalve mollusks destined to the market for human consumption:

• For okadaic acid, dinophysistoxins and pectenotoxins together, 160 micrograms of okadaic

acid equivalent per kilogram

• For yessotoxin, 1 milligram of yessotoxin equivalent per kilogram

• For azaspiracids, 160 micrograms of azaspiracids equivalent per kilogram

In the past, aside from bioassays on mice, most analytical techniques developed for the determina-

tion of marine biotoxins in bivalve mollusks have been based on offline methodologies, i.e. methods

involving solid phase extraction (SPE) or liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) followed by high-pressure

liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorometric or UV-diode array detection, or detection by

liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS).

The EU Commission Regulation (EC) No 15/2011,

2

amending Regulation (EC) No 2074/2005

about the testing methods for detecting marine biotoxins in bivalve molluscs, describes an

LC-MS/MS procedure as the reference method for the quantification of lipophilic marine biotoxins,

namely okadaic acid, pectenotoxin 2, azaspiracid 1, and yessotoxin. Moreover, dinophysistoxin 1

(DTX-1) and dinophysistoxin 2 (DTX-2) can be quantified by the calibration curve of okadaic

acid, pectenotoxin 1 by the calibration of pectenotoxin 2, azaspiracid 2 and 3 by the calibration

of azaspiracid 1 and 45-OH-, and 45-homo-OH-yessotoxin by the calibration of yessotoxin.

The purpose of this document is to describe the possible alternatives for analysis of marine

biotoxins in various samples, applying LC-MS based either on triple quadrupole or high-resolution

accurate-mass (HRAM) mass spectrometry (MS).

From Mouse Bioassay to Techniques of the 21st Century

Besides the mouse bioassay test, triple quadrupole LC-MS/MS methods have been the most

commonly used detection techniques for marine biotoxins, providing high sensitivity and selectivity.

However, this technique requires detection of compounds that are pre-selected and fine tuning of

system parameters in order to detect low concentrations in complex matrices. Despite the lack of

capabilities to screen for larger number of compounds, unknown toxins or new metabolites of

known substances, LC and UHPLC-MS/MS have been used successfully in many routine labs.

Recently, HRAM MS has introduced new advantages to residual analysis. Due to the fact the data

acquisition is always performed in the full-scan mode, no special parameter setup or tuning for

specific compounds is needed. The selectivity and sensitivity of the method is achieved via post-

processing of the data using extraction of accurate mass data from the full scan records. By doing

so, selectivity comparable to or better than with triple quadrupole LC-MS/MS technology is

obtained.

3

In addition, post-processing allows for retrospective analysis in order to search for new,

emerging toxins or their metabolites. It also helps to eliminate false positive and false negative

results by providing additional, confirmatory information.

Several types of mass spectrometers operating at high resolving power and providing accurate mass

information have been introduced in the past. The most recent and most advanced instruments are

based on the Thermo Scientific

Orbitrap

mass analyzer, originally developed by Makarov and

colleagues.

4

The improvements introduced by Orbitrap technology, such as ease of use, mass axis

accuracy and stability, and ultra-high resolving power, have encouraged the adoption of HRAM

systems even in routine laboratories.