Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  199 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 199 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

5

Thermo Scienti c Poster Note

PN63785_E 03/13S

Conclusion

A large number of compounds, with lo

a new LC/MS/MS platform demonstra

compounds of interest to clinical rese

The Prelude SPLC Systemʼs lower vo

shorter. The reduced run time results

phases and less waste disposal.

The Prelude SPLC uses a single syri

dampeners, reduces the mechanical

active check valves, and does not ne

maintenance, reducing operating cost

FIGURE 2. Representative Chromatograms at the LOQ for Each Compound

Tested Using a Prelude SLPC

TM

LC/MS/MS System

d Using a Prelude SLPC

TM

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

Busulfan

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Cortisol

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

Imatinib

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Methotrexate

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

200

400

600

800

25-Hydroxy Vitamin D2

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

1000

2000

3000

25-Hydroxy Vitamin D3

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Testosterone

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Cyclosporin A

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2200

Sirolimus

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Tacrolimus

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Everolimus

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

specificity criterion. Recoveries, including

data is summarized in Tables 1 to 3. Figur

compound tested. Representative chroma

each compound are shown in Figure 2.

The improvement in run times resultin

System verses a conventional HPLC is illu

phases and columns were used for the co

of certain steps cannot be changed becau

separation needed. The duration of others

for solvent changes to reach the column.

dependent on the chromatography and; th

However, the transfer, column cleaning an

conventional HPLC the transfer step was

column clean-up and equilibration steps w

reduction in run time of 29% (5:15 minute

solvent consumption by 33%.

FIGURE 3. Comparison of the Metho

SLPC LC/MS/MS System to that of a

0

50

100

Prelude SPLC

Conventional HPLC

Sample

Clean-up

Sample

Clean-up

Sample

Transfer

Sample

Transfer

S

20

30

40

50

Sirolimus

Concentration (ng/mL)

20

30

40

50

Tacrolimus

Concentration (ng/mL)

150

200

250

300

350

400

Cortisol

Concentration (ng/mL)

300

400

500

600

700

Methotrexate

Concentration (ng/mL)

40

60

80

100

-Hydroxy Vitamin D3

Concentration (ng/mL)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

1000

2000

3000

Docetaxel

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

400

600

800

1000

Docetaxel

Concentration (ng/mL)