Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  198 / 658 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 198 / 658 Next Page
Page Background

4

The Utilization of Novel Platform in a LC-MS/MS Work ow for the Analysis of Vitamin D, Testosterone, Immunosuppressants, Chemotherapeutics and Cortisol

very

FIGURE 2. Representative

Tested Using a Prelude SL

ange

oretical)

Intraday Precession Range (%RSD)

High QC Low QC Mid QC High QC

2.11 – 9.72

1.7 – 4.2

1.1 – 2.9

1.4 – 2.7

0.11 – 13.6

7.5 -10.6

1.8 – 2.8

4.7 – 7.6

0.81 – 10.2

5.4 – 8.3

1.7 – 3.5

1.6 – 4.1

0.34 – 8.38

4.8 – 6.0

1.3 – 2.6

1.4 – 2.3

1.63 – 4.84

3.4 – 3.6

1.5 – 2.6

0.8 – 1.2

0.03 – 15.1

4.0 – 6.3

2.3 – 3.9

2.6 – 5.1

0.22 – 5.83

1.1 – 10.9

1.8 – 3.3

1.6 – 4.2

0.26 – 6.98

1.6 – 9.4

1.1 – 3.7

0.9 – 3.4

0.0 – 11.7

1.0 – 1.9

1.1 – 7.4

1.3 – 6.2

0.10 – 10.5

3.3 – 7.5

0.6 – 5.9

2.8 – 7.8

0.3 – 11.2

5.0 – 11.5

2.9 – 6.6

1.9 – 5.1

0.9 – 13.3

6.3 – 6.8

2.3 – 3.9

2.0 – 3.2

y

oretical)

Interday Precession (%RSD)

High QC Low QC Mid QC High QC

3.06

12.2

9.7

12.2

3.75

7.8

8.1

1.8

2.98

9.7

5.4

4.6

3.75

5.1

3.2

2.9

3.12

3.5

1.3

0.15

3.50

3.3

3.8

2.7

3.85

5.6

5.4

3.9

1.28

4.2

4.4

3.1

3.74

4.0

2.0

5.9

0.48

5.5

2.8

7.5

2.87

3.9

4.0

4.8

0.00

3.4

3.1

3.9

FIGURE 1. Standard Curves for Each Compound Tested Using a Prelude SLPC

TM

LC/MS/MS System

Linearity (r

2

)

Recovery

0.992 – 0.998

87.3 – 93.9

0.998 – 0.999

86.9 – 93.9

0.992 – 0.998

88.5 – 95.2

0.998 – 0.999

87.3 – 97.9

0.994 – 0.999

99.9 – 103.5

0.997 – 0.999

88.3 – 114.1

0.995 – 0.998

89.4 – 93.5

0.993 – 0.999

96.6 – 102.1

0.991 – 0.998

92.0 – 110.2

0.992 – 0.998

102 – 111.8

0.992 – 0.998

92.2 – 94.5

0.992 – 0.996

95.0 - 98.9

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

Busulf

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

0

200

400

600

800

25-Hy

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Tes

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Time (min)

Intensity (mv)

0

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

0

10

20

30

40

50

Cyclosporin A

Concentration (ng/mL)

Peak Area Ratio (Sample/IS)

0

10

20

30

40

50

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Sirolimus

Concentration (ng/mL)

Peak Area Ratio (Sample/IS)

0

10

20

30

40

50

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Everolimus

Concentration (ng/mL)

Peak Area Ratio (Sample/IS)

0

10

20

30

40

50

0

1

2

3

4

Tacrolimus

Concentration (ng/mL)

Peak Area Ratio (Sample/IS)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Testosterone

Concentration (pg/mL)

Peak Area Ratio (Sample/IS)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0

5

10

15

20

25

Cortisol

Concentration (ng/mL)

Peak Area Ratio (Sample/IS)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Busulfan

Concentration (ng/mL)

Peak Area Ratio (Sample/IS)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Imatinib

Concentration (ng/mL)

Peak Area Ratio (Sample/IS)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Methotrexate

Concentration (ng/mL)

Peak Area Ratio (Sample/IS)

0

20

40

60

80

100

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

25-Hydroxy Vitamin D2

Concentration (ng/mL)

Peak Area Ratio (Sample/IS)

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

25-Hydroxy Vitamin D3

Concentration (ng/mL)

Peak Area Ratio (Sample/IS)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0

1

2

3

4

Docetaxel

Concentration (ng/mL)

Peak Area Ratio (Sample/IS)