Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  175 / 302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 175 / 302 Next Page
Page Background

The optimization of selective reaction monitoring (SRM)

parameters was performed by direct infusion of standards.

Collision-induced dissociation (CID) data were recorded

for each analyte including optimum collision energies

for the selected ion transitions.

Table 1 summarizes all the mass transitions found for

each analyte and its relative collision energy (CE) and

tube lens values.

Results and Discussion

To ensure thorough validation of the method, neat

standard solutions, standard addition on purified

extracts, and spiked blank tissue extracts were prepared

and compared.

Table 2 lists the correlation coefficients (r

2

) indicating the

linearity of the calibration curves for the three types of

samples analyzed; five concentrations of the sample solution

are considered (2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 μg/kg or similar).

To assess the inter-day repeatability of the method, ten

replicates of spiked samples were analyzed between

days. Solutions were prepared containing all the toxins

in the five different concentrations used to perform the

calibration curves (2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 μg/kg or similar).

The repeatability of the method expressed as the

coefficient of variation percentage (CV %) has been

rated less than 20% as shown in Table 3.

Analyte

ESI Mode

Parent Mass

Product Mass

Collision Energy

Tube Lens

AZA-1

ESI+

842.3

806.1

51

207

824.2

42

207

AZA-2

ESI+

856.3

838.1

42

214

820.2

49

214

AZA-3

ESI+

828.3

792.2

48

192

810.0

40

192

PTX-2

ESI+

876.3

841.3

35

205

823.0

40

205

805.3

41

205

DTX-1

ESI-

817.0

255.0

69

197

113.1

67

197

DTX-2

ESI-

803.15

255.3

61

207

113.1

50

207

YTX

ESI-

1141.5

1061.7

50

240

570.2

467.3

40

240

OA

ESI-

803.3

254.9

68

216

113.1

50

216

Table 1: Selected ion transitions (

m/z

) of the studied compounds and optimized collision energy and tube lens value for the TSQ Quantum Ultra triple quadrupole

mass spectrometer

Analyte

Neat Solution

Spiked Purified Extract

Spiked Extract

AZA-1

0.9932

0.9965

0.9970

AZA-2

0.9973

0.9964

0.9901

AZA-3

0.9972

0.9958

0.9993

DTX-1

0.9964

0.9995

0.9953

DTX-2

0.9973

0.9966

0.9965

YTX

0.9999

0.9923

0.9988

PTX-2

1.0000

0.9977

0.9927

OA

0.9955

0.9924

0.9927

Table 2: Correlation Coefficient (r

2

) of the calibration curves for the three types of samples analyzed in

the concentration range of 2–50 μg/kg)

Analyte

Standard Deviation

Repeatability

CV%

AZA-1

0.25

0.79

20

AZA-2

0.29

0.90

18

AZA-3

0.43

1.37

17

DTX-1

0.18

0.55

2

DTX-2

0.22

0.68

9

YTX

0.12

0.40

12

PTX-2

0.39

1.36

20

OA

0.16

0.48

4

Table 3: Values of CV% obtained for the repeatability of the lower concentrated curve point (2 µg/kg)